José‐Francisco Rocha
- Neurology top 2%
- Geriatrics and Gerontology top 1%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 5%
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 10%
- Molecular Biology
- Co-authors
- Patrício Soares‐da‐SilvaJoaquim J. FerreiraOlivier RascolAndrew J. LeesAmílcar FalcãoTeresa NunesWerner PoeweLuís Almeida
- Topics
- Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments (31 papers)Neurological disorders and treatments (21 papers)Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (10 papers)
- Partner nations
- PortugalUnited KingdomFrance
In The Last Decade
José‐Francisco Rocha
46 papers receiving 1.3k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 91
- Neurology 680
- Geriatrics and Gerontology 308
- Psychiatry and Mental health 286
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 197
- Molecular Biology 190
Countries citing papers authored by José‐Francisco Rocha
This map shows the geographic impact of José‐Francisco Rocha's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by José‐Francisco Rocha with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites José‐Francisco Rocha more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by José‐Francisco Rocha
This network shows the impact of papers produced by José‐Francisco Rocha. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by José‐Francisco Rocha. The network helps show where José‐Francisco Rocha may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of José‐Francisco Rocha
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of José‐Francisco Rocha. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of José‐Francisco Rocha based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with José‐Francisco Rocha. José‐Francisco Rocha is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 5 | |
| 7 | 11 | |
| 8 | 14 | |
| 9 | 22 | |
| 10 | 40 | |
| 11 | 12 | |
| 12 | 184 | |
| 13 | 24 | |
| 14 | 49 | |
| 15 | 18 | |
| 16 | 369 | |
| 17 | 16 | |
| 18 | 89 | |
| 19 | 16 | |
| 20 | 7 |
About José‐Francisco Rocha
José‐Francisco Rocha is a scholar working on Neurology, Psychiatry and Mental health and Geriatrics and Gerontology, having authored 49 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments (31 papers), Neurological disorders and treatments (21 papers) and Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geriatrics and Gerontology (308 citations), Neurology (680 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (286 citations). José‐Francisco Rocha has collaborated with scholars based in Portugal, United Kingdom and France. Frequent co-authors include Patrício Soares‐da‐Silva, Joaquim J. Ferreira, Olivier Rascol, Andrew J. Lees, Amílcar Falcão, Teresa Nunes, Werner Poewe, Luís Almeida, Manuel Vaz‐da‐Silva and Lyndon Wright. Their work appears in journals such as Neurology, The Lancet Neurology and CHEST Journal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.