Countries citing papers authored by Josef Klevanski
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Josef Klevanski's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Josef Klevanski with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Josef Klevanski more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Josef Klevanski. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Josef Klevanski. The network helps show where Josef Klevanski may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Josef Klevanski
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Josef Klevanski.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Josef Klevanski based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Josef Klevanski. Josef Klevanski is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Dumont, Étienne, Josef Klevanski, Bodo Reimann, et al.. (2021). CALLISTO: A Demonstrator for Reusable Launcher Key Technologies. TRANSACTIONS OF THE JAPAN SOCIETY FOR AERONAUTICAL AND SPACE SCIENCES AEROSPACE TECHNOLOGY JAPAN. 19(1). 106–115.13 indexed citations
Sippel, Martin, et al.. (2019). European Next Reusable Ariane (ENTRAIN): A Multidisciplinary Study on a VTVL and a VTHL Booster Stage. elib (German Aerospace Center).4 indexed citations
Gülhan, Ali, Josef Klevanski, & Sebastian Willems. (2011). Experimental Study of the Dynamic Stability of the Exomars Capsule. elib (German Aerospace Center).3 indexed citations
11.
Klevanski, Josef. (2010). Analyse der Stabilität und Steuerbarkeit von elastischen mehrstufigen Raumtransportsystemen in der Vorentwurfsphase. elib (German Aerospace Center).1 indexed citations
12.
Sippel, Martin, et al.. (2008). Future European Expendable Launcher Options and Technology Preparation. elib (German Aerospace Center).1 indexed citations
13.
Sippel, Martin & Josef Klevanski. (2005). Comparative Study on Options for High-Speed Interc.... 56th International Astronautical Congress of the International Astronautical Federation, the International Academy of Astronautics, and the International Institute of Space Law.3 indexed citations
14.
Sippel, Martin & Josef Klevanski. (2004). Preliminary Definition of an Aerodynamic Configuration for a Reusable Booster Stage within Tight Geometric Constraints. elib (German Aerospace Center). 563. 21.11 indexed citations
15.
Sippel, Martin, et al.. (2004). Search For Technically Viable Options for Improve RLV Variable Wings. 55th International Astronautical Congress of the International Astronautical Federation, the International Academy of Astronautics, and the International Institute of Space Law.7 indexed citations
Klevanski, Josef, et al.. (2002). Parametrical Analyses of Liquid Fly Back Booster Ascent Controllability. elib (German Aerospace Center).1 indexed citations
19.
Sippel, Martin, Josef Klevanski, & Jens Kauffmann. (2001). Innovative Method for Return to the Launch Site of Reusable Winged Stages. elib (German Aerospace Center).16 indexed citations
20.
Sippel, Martin, et al.. (2001). Reusable Hydro-Carbon Booster Stages as a Replacement for Large Solid Rocket Motors. elib (German Aerospace Center).1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.