José Viana‐Gomes
- Materials Chemistry top 10%
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics top 10%
- Biomedical Engineering top 10%
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering
- Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials
- Co-authors
- A. H. Castro NetoN. M. R. PeresAires FerreiraVitor M. PereiraTong CaoVinícius RosaHan XieJohan Nilsson
- Topics
- 2D Materials and Applications (7 papers)Graphene research and applications (6 papers)Advanced Fiber Laser Technologies (5 papers)
In The Last Decade
José Viana‐Gomes
19 papers receiving 661 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
- Materials Chemistry 415
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 338
- Biomedical Engineering 283
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering 196
- Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 72
Countries citing papers authored by José Viana‐Gomes
This map shows the geographic impact of José Viana‐Gomes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by José Viana‐Gomes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites José Viana‐Gomes more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by José Viana‐Gomes
This network shows the impact of papers produced by José Viana‐Gomes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by José Viana‐Gomes. The network helps show where José Viana‐Gomes may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of José Viana‐Gomes
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of José Viana‐Gomes. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of José Viana‐Gomes based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with José Viana‐Gomes. José Viana‐Gomes is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 5 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 6 | |
| 6 | 11 | |
| 7 | 32 | |
| 8 | 16 | |
| 9 | 75 | |
| 10 | 62 | |
| 11 | 0 | |
| 12 | 3 | |
| 13 | 22 | |
| 14 | 84 | |
| 15 | 25 | |
| 16 | 122 | |
| 17 | 140 | |
| 18 | 17 | |
| 19 | A unified description of the dc conductivity of monolayer and bilayer graphene based on resonant scatterers | 1 |
| 20 | 37 |
About José Viana‐Gomes
José Viana‐Gomes is a scholar working on Materials Chemistry, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Instrumentation, having authored 21 papers that have together received 673 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include 2D Materials and Applications (7 papers), Graphene research and applications (6 papers) and Advanced Fiber Laser Technologies (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (338 citations), Materials Chemistry (415 citations) and Biomedical Engineering (283 citations). José Viana‐Gomes has collaborated with scholars based in Singapore, Portugal and Brazil. Frequent co-authors include A. H. Castro Neto, N. M. R. Peres, Aires Ferreira, Vitor M. Pereira, Tong Cao, Vinícius Rosa, Han Xie, Johan Nilsson, Eduardo R. Mucciolo and Yu. V. Bludov. Their work appears in journals such as Advanced Materials, Nano Letters and Physical Review B.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.