James A. Grieve
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics top 10%
- Biomedical Engineering
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering
- Artificial Intelligence top 10%
- Automotive Engineering top 10%
- Co-authors
- M. J. MilesD. M. CarberryDavid L. DaggettKaushik RajashekaraMiles J. PadgettDavid B. PhillipsRichard BowmanGraham M. Gibson
- Topics
- Orbital Angular Momentum in Optics (9 papers)Quantum Information and Cryptography (8 papers)Quantum Mechanics and Applications (7 papers)
- Partner nations
- SingaporeUnited KingdomUnited Arab Emirates
In The Last Decade
James A. Grieve
32 papers receiving 564 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 356
- Biomedical Engineering 232
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering 170
- Artificial Intelligence 114
- Automotive Engineering 56
Countries citing papers authored by James A. Grieve
This map shows the geographic impact of James A. Grieve's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James A. Grieve with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James A. Grieve more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by James A. Grieve
This network shows the impact of papers produced by James A. Grieve. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James A. Grieve. The network helps show where James A. Grieve may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of James A. Grieve
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James A. Grieve. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James A. Grieve based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with James A. Grieve. James A. Grieve is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 5 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 6 | |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | 0 | |
| 7 | 3 | |
| 8 | 6 | |
| 9 | 3 | |
| 10 | 11 | |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | 10 | |
| 13 | 35 | |
| 14 | 12 | |
| 15 | 42 | |
| 16 | 3 | |
| 17 | 26 | |
| 18 | 59 | |
| 19 | 29 | |
| 20 | 34 |
About James A. Grieve
James A. Grieve is a scholar working on Acoustics and Ultrasonics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 36 papers that have together received 589 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Orbital Angular Momentum in Optics (9 papers), Quantum Information and Cryptography (8 papers) and Quantum Mechanics and Applications (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Acoustics and Ultrasonics (15 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (356 citations) and Biomedical Engineering (232 citations). James A. Grieve has collaborated with scholars based in Singapore, United Kingdom and United Arab Emirates. Frequent co-authors include M. J. Miles, D. M. Carberry, David L. Daggett, Kaushik Rajashekara, Miles J. Padgett, David B. Phillips, Richard Bowman, Graham M. Gibson, Alexander Ling and Sam N. Olof. Their work appears in journals such as Nano Letters, Applied Physics Letters and Scientific Reports.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.