José Luís Beato
About
In The Last Decade
José Luís Beato
6 papers receiving 265 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
- Internal Medicine 104
- Epidemiology 103
- Small Animals 95
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 94
- Food Science 45
Countries citing papers authored by José Luís Beato
This map shows the geographic impact of José Luís Beato's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by José Luís Beato with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites José Luís Beato more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by José Luís Beato
This network shows the impact of papers produced by José Luís Beato. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by José Luís Beato. The network helps show where José Luís Beato may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of José Luís Beato
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of José Luís Beato. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of José Luís Beato based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with José Luís Beato. José Luís Beato is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 31 | |
| 2 | 24 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 113 | |
| 5 | 32 | |
| 6 | 80 | |
| 7 | 5 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.