José Lorenzoni
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine top 10%
- Neurology top 5%
- Epidemiology
- Genetics top 5%
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine top 10%
- Co-authors
- Marc LevivierNicolas MassagerDaniel DevriendtJacques BrotchiPaul Van HoutteFrançoise DesmedtS. RuizPhilippe David
- Topics
- Meningioma and schwannoma management (10 papers)Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment (7 papers)Trigeminal Neuralgia and Treatments (6 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of neurosurgeryInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*PhysicsNeurosurgery
- Partner nations
- BelgiumChileSwitzerland
In The Last Decade
José Lorenzoni
17 papers receiving 617 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 42
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 301
- Neurology 246
- Epidemiology 244
- Genetics 230
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 211
Countries citing papers authored by José Lorenzoni
This map shows the geographic impact of José Lorenzoni's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by José Lorenzoni with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites José Lorenzoni more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by José Lorenzoni
This network shows the impact of papers produced by José Lorenzoni. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by José Lorenzoni. The network helps show where José Lorenzoni may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of José Lorenzoni
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of José Lorenzoni. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of José Lorenzoni based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with José Lorenzoni. José Lorenzoni is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 26 | |
| 5 | 6 | |
| 6 | 39 | |
| 7 | 46 | |
| 8 | 36 | |
| 9 | 8 | |
| 10 | 8 | |
| 11 | 12 | |
| 12 | 18 | |
| 13 | 218 | |
| 14 | 106 | |
| 15 | Use of stereotactic PET images in dosimetry planning of radiosurgery for brain tumors: clinical experience and proposed classification. | 64 |
| 16 | 10 | |
| 17 | 39 |
About José Lorenzoni
José Lorenzoni is a scholar working on Neurology, Genetics and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 17 papers that have together received 639 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Meningioma and schwannoma management (10 papers), Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment (7 papers) and Trigeminal Neuralgia and Treatments (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Genetics (230 citations), Neurology (246 citations) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (211 citations). José Lorenzoni has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, Chile and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Marc Levivier, Nicolas Massager, Daniel Devriendt, Jacques Brotchi, Paul Van Houtte, Françoise Desmedt, S. Ruiz, Philippe David, Bruno Vanderlinden and P. David. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of neurosurgery, International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics and Neurosurgery.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.