José D. Carrillo‐Ruiz
- Neurology top 1%
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 2%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 5%
- Neurology top 2%
- Co-authors
- Ana Luisa VelascoMarcos VelascoFrancisco VelascoGuillermo CastroFiacro JiménezFrancisco BritoDavid TrejoGuillermo Fanghänel
- Topics
- Neurological disorders and treatments (33 papers)Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments (17 papers)Genetic Neurodegenerative Diseases (10 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaPainJournal of neurosurgery
In The Last Decade
José D. Carrillo‐Ruiz
92 papers receiving 1.7k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 97
- Neurology 1.2k
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 810
- Cognitive Neuroscience 483
- Psychiatry and Mental health 434
- Neurology 392
Countries citing papers authored by José D. Carrillo‐Ruiz
This map shows the geographic impact of José D. Carrillo‐Ruiz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by José D. Carrillo‐Ruiz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites José D. Carrillo‐Ruiz more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by José D. Carrillo‐Ruiz
This network shows the impact of papers produced by José D. Carrillo‐Ruiz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by José D. Carrillo‐Ruiz. The network helps show where José D. Carrillo‐Ruiz may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of José D. Carrillo‐Ruiz
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of José D. Carrillo‐Ruiz. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of José D. Carrillo‐Ruiz based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with José D. Carrillo‐Ruiz. José D. Carrillo‐Ruiz is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 0 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | 6 | |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | 3 | |
| 15 | 6 | |
| 16 | 6 | |
| 17 | 63 | |
| 18 | 25 | |
| 19 | 13 | |
| 20 | 152 |
About José D. Carrillo‐Ruiz
José D. Carrillo‐Ruiz is a scholar working on Neurology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Neurology, having authored 100 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neurological disorders and treatments (33 papers), Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments (17 papers) and Genetic Neurodegenerative Diseases (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neurology (1.2k citations), Neurology (392 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (810 citations). José D. Carrillo‐Ruiz has collaborated with scholars based in Mexico, Russia and Guatemala. Frequent co-authors include Ana Luisa Velasco, Marcos Velasco, Francisco Velasco, Guillermo Castro, Fiacro Jiménez, Francisco Brito, David Trejo, Guillermo Fanghänel, Bernardo Boleaga and Irma Márquez. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Pain and Journal of neurosurgery.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.