553 total citations 49 papers, 189 citations indexed
About
José Chabás is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Archeology and History and Philosophy of Science.
According to data from OpenAlex, José Chabás has authored 49 papers receiving a total of 189 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 43 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 24 papers in Archeology and 13 papers in History and Philosophy of Science. Recurrent topics in José Chabás's work include Historical Astronomy and Related Studies (42 papers), Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies (20 papers) and History and Theory of Mathematics (11 papers). José Chabás is often cited by papers focused on Historical Astronomy and Related Studies (42 papers), Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies (20 papers) and History and Theory of Mathematics (11 papers). José Chabás collaborates with scholars based in Spain, United States and Belgium. José Chabás's co-authors include Bernard R. Goldstein, Goldstein and Raymond Mercier and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Perspectives on Science and Archive for History of Exact Sciences.
In The Last Decade
José Chabás
42 papers
receiving
158 citations
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of José Chabás's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by José Chabás with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites José Chabás more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by José Chabás. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by José Chabás. The network helps show where José Chabás may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of José Chabás
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of José Chabás.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of José Chabás based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with José Chabás. José Chabás is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Goldstein, Bernard R. & José Chabás. (2016). The Astronomical Tables of Moses Farissol Botarel. RACO (Revistes Catalanes amb Accés Obert) (Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya). 29–66.1 indexed citations
7.
Goldstein, Bernard R. & José Chabás. (2015). Three Tables for the Daily Positions of the Moon in a Fifteenth-Century Hebrew Manuscript. Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University). 15(2). 319–341.1 indexed citations
Chabás, José. (2014). Aspects of Arabic Influence on Astronomical Tables in Medieval Europe. RACO (Revistes Catalanes amb Accés Obert) (Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya). 13(13). 23–40.2 indexed citations
12.
Chabás, José. (2014). SIDOLI, Nathan & VAN BRUMMELEN, Glen (eds.), From Alexandria Through Baghdad. Surveys and Studies in the Ancient Greek and Medieval Islamic Mathematical Sciences in Honor of J. L. Berggren, Springer- Verlag (Berlin-Heidelberg, 2014). 13. 220–224.1 indexed citations
Goldstein, Bernard R. & José Chabás. (1996). Ibn al-Kammâd's Star List. Centaurus. 38(4). 317–334.3 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.