This map shows the geographic impact of Jos Berghman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jos Berghman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jos Berghman more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jos Berghman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jos Berghman. The network helps show where Jos Berghman may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jos Berghman
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jos Berghman.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jos Berghman based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Jos Berghman. Jos Berghman is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Berghman, Jos, Béa Cantillon, Pierre Devolder, et al.. (2014). Un contrat social performant et fiable. Digital Access to Libraries.2 indexed citations
2.
Berghman, Jos, et al.. (2012). Les trois piliers du paysage Belge des pensions de retraite. Aperçu et défis. Lirias (KU Leuven). 54(1). 5–54.1 indexed citations
3.
Palmans, Sofie, et al.. (2007). Loopbaanprofielen en de gevolgen voor vrouwen. Een evaluatie van de maatregel tot versoepeling van het minimumpensioen. Lirias (KU Leuven).1 indexed citations
Berghman, Jos, et al.. (2004). By the Way of Conclusion. SSRN Electronic Journal.
6.
Hemerijck, Anton & Jos Berghman. (2004). The European social patrimony: deepening social Europe through legitimate diversity. Lirias (KU Leuven).6 indexed citations
7.
Peeters, Hans, et al.. (2003). Onzichtbare pensioenen in België: over de aard, omvang en verdeling van de tweede en derde pensioenpijler. Lirias (KU Leuven).1 indexed citations
8.
Mayes, David G., Jos Berghman, & Robert Salais. (2001). Social Exclusion and European Policy. Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks.41 indexed citations
9.
Begg, Iain, et al.. (2001). Social Exclusion and Social Protection in the European Union : Policy Issues and Proposals for the Future Role of the EU. Lirias (KU Leuven).17 indexed citations
10.
Berghman, Jos. (1998). Can the idea of benchmarking be applied to social protection. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS). 4. 119–130.1 indexed citations
Room, Graham, et al.. (1992). Observatory on national policies to combat social exclusion. Second annual report. Archive of European Integration (AEI) (University of Pittsburgh).6 indexed citations
Room, Graham, et al.. (1991). National policies to combat social exclusion: first annual report of the European Community Observatory. Archive of European Integration (AEI) (University of Pittsburgh).2 indexed citations
18.
Berghman, Jos, et al.. (1990). Neue Armut in der Europäischen Gemeinschaft. Campus eBooks.1 indexed citations
19.
Berghman, Jos, et al.. (1988). Armoede en armoedeonderzoek in de EG. Tijdschrift voor Arbeidsvraagstukken. 15–26.1 indexed citations
20.
Berghman, Jos & Ruud Muffels. (1988). Armoede en armoedeonderzoek in de EG. Eerste en voorlopige resultaten voor Nederland.2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.