Joris J. Glas

1.7k total citations
17 papers, 1.2k citations indexed

About

Joris J. Glas is a scholar working on Insect Science, Plant Science and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics. According to data from OpenAlex, Joris J. Glas has authored 17 papers receiving a total of 1.2k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 14 papers in Insect Science, 12 papers in Plant Science and 6 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics. Recurrent topics in Joris J. Glas's work include Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (13 papers), Plant and animal studies (6 papers) and Plant Parasitism and Resistance (6 papers). Joris J. Glas is often cited by papers focused on Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (13 papers), Plant and animal studies (6 papers) and Plant Parasitism and Resistance (6 papers). Joris J. Glas collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, Spain and Germany. Joris J. Glas's co-authors include Merijn R. Kant, Juan M. Alba, Bernardus C. J. Schimmel, Robert C. Schuurink, Rocío Escobar‐Bravo, Carlos A. Villarroel, Maurice W. Sabelis, Thomas Van Leeuwen, Wannes Dermauw and Lívia M. S. Ataíde and has published in prestigious journals such as New Phytologist, The Plant Journal and International Journal of Molecular Sciences.

In The Last Decade

Joris J. Glas

17 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Joris J. Glas Netherlands 11 781 765 365 347 62 17 1.2k
Anja David Germany 17 659 0.8× 673 0.9× 239 0.7× 429 1.2× 62 1.0× 23 1.0k
Nathalie Veyrat Switzerland 13 1.0k 1.3× 770 1.0× 352 1.0× 285 0.8× 76 1.2× 13 1.4k
Mario Kallenbach Germany 14 614 0.8× 488 0.6× 265 0.7× 317 0.9× 50 0.8× 20 898
Bernardus C. J. Schimmel Netherlands 17 938 1.2× 756 1.0× 569 1.6× 391 1.1× 60 1.0× 25 1.4k
J. L. Bi United States 12 722 0.9× 685 0.9× 247 0.7× 203 0.6× 108 1.7× 24 1.1k
Juan M. Alba Netherlands 19 1.1k 1.4× 1.0k 1.4× 510 1.4× 446 1.3× 75 1.2× 33 1.6k
Matthias Held Switzerland 10 977 1.3× 870 1.1× 538 1.5× 438 1.3× 91 1.5× 12 1.5k
Ursula Schittko Germany 10 995 1.3× 962 1.3× 403 1.1× 477 1.4× 82 1.3× 11 1.4k
Rupesh Kariyat United States 20 859 1.1× 640 0.8× 293 0.8× 465 1.3× 110 1.8× 82 1.3k
Si‐Jun Zheng Netherlands 18 1.2k 1.5× 769 1.0× 415 1.1× 415 1.2× 70 1.1× 23 1.5k

Countries citing papers authored by Joris J. Glas

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Joris J. Glas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joris J. Glas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joris J. Glas more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Joris J. Glas

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joris J. Glas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joris J. Glas. The network helps show where Joris J. Glas may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Joris J. Glas

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Joris J. Glas. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Joris J. Glas based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Joris J. Glas. Joris J. Glas is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
1.
Glas, Joris J., et al.. (2025). Glandless, a tomato HDZIP transcription factor, is important for the gland formation of type VI trichomes. The Plant Journal. 123(1). e70308–e70308. 1 indexed citations
2.
Legarrea, Saioa, Arne Janssen, Joris J. Glas, et al.. (2022). Enhanced top‐down control of herbivore population growth on plants with impaired defences. Functional Ecology. 36(11). 2859–2872. 10 indexed citations
3.
Greenhalgh, Robert, Wannes Dermauw, Joris J. Glas, et al.. (2020). Genome streamlining in a minute herbivore that manipulates its host plant. eLife. 9. 34 indexed citations
4.
Schimmel, Bernardus C. J., Juan M. Alba, Nicky Wybouw, et al.. (2018). Distinct Signatures of Host Defense Suppression by Plant-Feeding Mites. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 19(10). 3265–3265. 20 indexed citations
5.
Glas, Joris J., et al.. (2017). Drought stress promotes the colonization success of a herbivorous mite that manipulates plant defenses. Experimental and Applied Acarology. 73(3-4). 297–315. 17 indexed citations
6.
Villarroel, Carlos A., Wim Jonckheere, Juan M. Alba, et al.. (2016). Salivary proteins of spider mites suppress defenses in Nicotiana benthamiana and promote mite reproduction. The Plant Journal. 86(2). 119–131. 117 indexed citations
7.
Kant, Merijn R., Wim Jonckheere, Bram Knegt, et al.. (2015). Mechanisms and ecological consequences of plant defence induction and suppression in herbivore communities. Annals of Botany. 115(7). 1015–1051. 239 indexed citations
8.
Glas, Joris J., Juan M. Alba, Sauro Simoni, et al.. (2014). Defense suppression benefits herbivores that have a monopoly on their feeding site but can backfire within natural communities. BMC Biology. 12(1). 98–98. 70 indexed citations
9.
Alba, Juan M., Bernardus C. J. Schimmel, Joris J. Glas, et al.. (2014). Spider mites suppress tomato defenses downstream of jasmonate and salicylate independently of hormonal crosstalk. New Phytologist. 205(2). 828–840. 139 indexed citations
10.
Glas, Joris J.. (2014). Consequences of russet mite-induced tomato defenses for community interactions. UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam). 1 indexed citations
11.
Glas, Joris J., Juan M. Alba, Sauro Simoni, et al.. (2014). Defense suppression benefits herbivores that have a monopoly on their feeding site but can backfire within natural communities. BMC Biology. 12(1). 98–98. 1 indexed citations
12.
Houten, Yvonne M. van, Joris J. Glas, H. Hoogerbrugge, et al.. (2012). Herbivory-associated degradation of tomato trichomes and its impact on biological control of Aculops lycopersici. Experimental and Applied Acarology. 60(2). 127–138. 57 indexed citations
13.
Glas, Joris J., Bernardus C. J. Schimmel, Juan M. Alba, et al.. (2012). Plant Glandular Trichomes as Targets for Breeding or Engineering of Resistance to Herbivores. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 13(12). 17077–17103. 391 indexed citations
14.
Alba, Juan M., Joris J. Glas, Bernardus C. J. Schimmel, & Merijn R. Kant. (2011). Avoidance and suppression of plant defenses by herbivores and pathogens. Journal of Plant Interactions. 6(4). 221–227. 59 indexed citations
15.
Glas, Joris J., et al.. (2010). Oviposition Behaviors in Relation to Rotation Resistance in the Western Corn Rootworm. Environmental Entomology. 39(6). 1922–1928. 3 indexed citations
16.
Glas, Joris J., J. van den Berg, & Roel Potting. (2007). Effect of learning on the oviposition preference of field-collected and laboratory-reared Chilo partellus (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) populations. Bulletin of Entomological Research. 97(4). 415–420. 9 indexed citations
17.
Schmidhalter, Urs, et al.. (2001). Application and testing of a crop scanning instrument – field experiments with reduced crop width, tall maize plants and monitoring of cereal yield. mediaTUM – the media and publications repository of the Technical University Munich (Technical University Munich). 953–958. 11 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026