Joop Konsten
- Surgery top 5%
- Rheumatology top 2%
- Oncology top 10%
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
- Physiology
- Co-authors
- Peter B. SoetersCor G. M. I. BaetenC. G. M. I. BaetenB. P. GeerdesFrank SpaansErik HeinemanMaarten van HeinsbergenJohanne G. Bloemen
- Topics
- Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments (16 papers)Anorectal Disease Treatments and Outcomes (15 papers)Pelvic floor disorders treatments (15 papers)
- Cited by
- RheumatologySurgeryOncology
- Journals
- New England Journal of MedicineSHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaAnnals of Surgery
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsUnited StatesGermany
In The Last Decade
Joop Konsten
50 papers receiving 1.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
- Surgery 952
- Rheumatology 528
- Oncology 427
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 116
- Physiology 49
Countries citing papers authored by Joop Konsten
This map shows the geographic impact of Joop Konsten's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joop Konsten with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joop Konsten more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Joop Konsten
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joop Konsten. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joop Konsten. The network helps show where Joop Konsten may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Joop Konsten
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Joop Konsten. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Joop Konsten based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Joop Konsten. Joop Konsten is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 13 | |
| 4 | 17 | |
| 5 | 9 | |
| 6 | 3 | |
| 7 | 25 | |
| 8 | 10 | |
| 9 | 14 | |
| 10 | 47 | |
| 11 | 9 | |
| 12 | 6 | |
| 13 | 46 | |
| 14 | 86 | |
| 15 | 70 | |
| 16 | 40 | |
| 17 | Assessment of ischaemia of the distal part of the gracilis muscle during transposition for anal dynamic graciloplasty. | 10 |
| 18 | 5 | |
| 19 | 14 | |
| 20 | 7 |
About Joop Konsten
Joop Konsten is a scholar working on Rheumatology, Surgery and Geriatrics and Gerontology, having authored 52 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments (16 papers), Anorectal Disease Treatments and Outcomes (15 papers) and Pelvic floor disorders treatments (15 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Rheumatology (528 citations), Surgery (952 citations) and Oncology (427 citations). Joop Konsten has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Peter B. Soeters, Cor G. M. I. Baeten, C. G. M. I. Baeten, B. P. Geerdes, Frank Spaans, Erik Heineman, Maarten van Heinsbergen, Johanne G. Bloemen, Eddy Adang and Gerard L. Engel. Their work appears in journals such as New England Journal of Medicine, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and Annals of Surgery.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.