Jon‐Paul Khoo

44.5k citations
7 papers · 482 · 1 hit paper · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

Jon‐Paul Khoo

7 papers receiving 472 citations

Jon‐Paul Khoo's Hit Papers

The prevalence and burden of bipolar disorder: findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013 2016 · 376 citations
3760+3+6Years since publication100200300

Peers

Jon‐Paul Khoo
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 249
  • Biological Psychiatry 38
  • Speech and Hearing 19
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 37
  • Pharmacology 42
Replace Federico Soldani with:
Federico Soldani United States
Angelo Termine United States
Imma Torres Spain
Tor‐Arne Hegvik Norway
Efrat Kravitz Israel
Tobias Rowland United Kingdom
Ute Keßler Norway
J. Sáiz‐Ruiz Spain
Rasmon Kalayasiri Thailand
Chih-Ken Chen Taiwan
Jon‐Paul Khoo relative to Federico Soldani United States Federico Soldani's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.2×
Federico Soldani · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jon‐Paul Khoo

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jon‐Paul Khoo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jon‐Paul Khoo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jon‐Paul Khoo more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jon‐Paul Khoo

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jon‐Paul Khoo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jon‐Paul Khoo. The network helps show where Jon‐Paul Khoo may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jon‐Paul Khoo, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jon‐Paul Khoo Line = papers co-authored together Jon‐Paul Khoo links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

7 of 7 papers shown
#Work
1
The prevalence and burden of bipolar disorder: findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013
Hit paper breakdown →
2016376
2 201134
3 201824
4 201920
5 202118
6 20189
7 20121

About Jon‐Paul Khoo

Jon‐Paul Khoo is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Plant Science, Pharmacology, Biological Psychiatry and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 7 papers that have together received 482 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Natural Compound Pharmacology Studies (2 papers), Tryptophan and brain disorders (1 paper), Treatment of Major Depression (1 paper), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (1 paper), Mental Health Research Topics (1 paper), Sleep and related disorders (1 paper), Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (1 paper) and Sleep and Wakefulness Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (249 citations), Biological Psychiatry (38 citations), Speech and Hearing (19 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (37 citations) and Pharmacology (42 citations). Jon‐Paul Khoo has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, South Africa and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Louisa Degenhardt, Harvey Whiteford, Emily Stockings, Theo Vos, Holly E Erskine, Alize J Ferrari, F. Picarel-Blanchot, Dan J. Stein, Michael Van Ameringen and Valérie Olivier. Their work appears in journals such as Frontiers in Psychiatry, Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, Advances in Therapy, European Neuropsychopharmacology and Bipolar Disorders.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact