Jonathan Williams

596 total citations
23 papers, 149 citations indexed

About

Jonathan Williams is a scholar working on Statistics and Probability, Artificial Intelligence and Urology. According to data from OpenAlex, Jonathan Williams has authored 23 papers receiving a total of 149 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Statistics and Probability, 4 papers in Artificial Intelligence and 3 papers in Urology. Recurrent topics in Jonathan Williams's work include Statistical Methods and Inference (7 papers), Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference (6 papers) and Pelvic floor disorders treatments (3 papers). Jonathan Williams is often cited by papers focused on Statistical Methods and Inference (7 papers), Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference (6 papers) and Pelvic floor disorders treatments (3 papers). Jonathan Williams collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Norway. Jonathan Williams's co-authors include Marcus J. Drake, Dominika Bijos, Jan Hannig, Clifford R. Jack, Curtis B. Storlie, Terry M. Therneau, Nicholas L. Zalewski, Elia Sechi, A. Sebastian López‐Chiriboga and Jiraporn Jitprapaikulsan and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of the American Statistical Association, Neurology and Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.

In The Last Decade

Jonathan Williams

16 papers receiving 143 citations

Peers

Jonathan Williams
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
  • Urology 60
  • Rheumatology 50
  • Artificial Intelligence 26
  • Epidemiology 25
  • Statistics and Probability 25
Replace Assaf Hilely with:
Assaf Hilely Israel
F. Del Corso Italy
László Viharos Hungary
Peter Bodkin United Kingdom
Joana Costa Portugal
Henry Russell Andrews United Kingdom
Matthias Boschheidgen Germany
Jihong Fang China
Carolina Solomon Romania
Assaf Hilely Israel View profile →
Citations per field, relative to Jonathan Williams
Jonathan Williams · 1×
Citations per year, relative to Jonathan Williams
Jonathan Williams · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by Jonathan Williams

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jonathan Williams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jonathan Williams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jonathan Williams more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jonathan Williams

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jonathan Williams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jonathan Williams. The network helps show where Jonathan Williams may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jonathan Williams

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jonathan Williams. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jonathan Williams based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jonathan Williams. Jonathan Williams is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 0
2 0
3 1
4 0
5 0
6 1
7 1
8 0
9 1
10 1
11 3
12 3
13 0
14 1
15 28
16 11
17
Covariance Selection in the Linear Mixed Effect Mode
1
18 18
19 50
20 1

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026