Jonathan van ‘t Riet

2.5k total citations
46 papers, 1.8k citations indexed

About

Jonathan van ‘t Riet is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, Sociology and Political Science and Literature and Literary Theory. According to data from OpenAlex, Jonathan van ‘t Riet has authored 46 papers receiving a total of 1.8k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 24 papers in Applied Psychology, 23 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 20 papers in Literature and Literary Theory. Recurrent topics in Jonathan van ‘t Riet's work include Behavioral Health and Interventions (24 papers), Media Influence and Health (19 papers) and Social and Intergroup Psychology (10 papers). Jonathan van ‘t Riet is often cited by papers focused on Behavioral Health and Interventions (24 papers), Media Influence and Health (19 papers) and Social and Intergroup Psychology (10 papers). Jonathan van ‘t Riet collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and Tanzania. Jonathan van ‘t Riet's co-authors include Hein de Vries, Robert A. C. Ruiter, Gert‐Jan de Bruijn, Marieke Q. Werrij, S.J. Sijtsema, Hans Dagevos, Rik Crutzen, P.E. Ketelaar, Frans Folkvord and Jeroen K. Vermunt and has published in prestigious journals such as Psychological Science, Journal of Business Research and Computers in Human Behavior.

In The Last Decade

Jonathan van ‘t Riet

45 papers receiving 1.7k citations

Peers

Jonathan van ‘t Riet
Leslie B. Snyder United States
Kristel M. Gallagher United States
Hyunyi Cho United States
Brian L. Quick United States
Nancy Rhodes United States
Rachel Povey United Kingdom
Roel C.J. Hermans Netherlands
Jonathan van ‘t Riet
Citations per year, relative to Jonathan van ‘t Riet Jonathan van ‘t Riet (= 1×) peers Monique Mitchell Turner

Countries citing papers authored by Jonathan van ‘t Riet

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jonathan van ‘t Riet's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jonathan van ‘t Riet with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jonathan van ‘t Riet more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jonathan van ‘t Riet

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jonathan van ‘t Riet. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jonathan van ‘t Riet. The network helps show where Jonathan van ‘t Riet may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jonathan van ‘t Riet

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jonathan van ‘t Riet. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jonathan van ‘t Riet based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jonathan van ‘t Riet. Jonathan van ‘t Riet is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
2.
Stekelenburg, Aart van, et al.. (2024). Communicating consensus among climate scientists increases estimates of consensus and belief in human-caused climate change across the globe. Journal of Environmental Psychology. 100. 102480–102480. 4 indexed citations
3.
Riet, Jonathan van ‘t & Mariska Kleemans. (2021). What drives selection of online children’s news articles?. Journalism. 24(1). 177–192. 1 indexed citations
4.
Folkvord, Frans, et al.. (2020). A Health Game Targeting Children's Implicit Attitudes and Snack Choices. Games for Health Journal. 9(6). 425–435. 6 indexed citations
5.
Folkvord, Frans, Doeschka J. Anschütz, Jonathan van ‘t Riet, et al.. (2018). Investigating the impact of a health game on implicit attitudes towards food and food choice behaviour of young adults. Appetite. 128. 294–302. 13 indexed citations
6.
Khan, Vassilis-Javed, P.E. Ketelaar, Jonathan van ‘t Riet, et al.. (2017). Does location congruence matter? A field study on the effects of location-based advertising on perceived ad intrusiveness, relevance & value. Computers in Human Behavior. 73. 659–668. 38 indexed citations
7.
Riet, Jonathan van ‘t, P.E. Ketelaar, Vassilis-Javed Khan, et al.. (2016). Investigating the Effects of Location-Based Advertising in the Supermarket: Does Goal Congruence Trump Location Congruence?. Journal of Interactive Advertising. 16(1). 31–43. 26 indexed citations
8.
Bruijn, Gert‐Jan de, et al.. (2016). Testing the effects of a message framing intervention on intentions towards hearing loss prevention in adolescents. Health Education Research. 31(2). 161–170. 15 indexed citations
9.
Onwezen, Marleen C., Jonathan van ‘t Riet, Hans Dagevos, S.J. Sijtsema, & H.M. Snoek. (2016). Snacking now or later? Individual differences in following intentions or habits explained by time perspective. Appetite. 107. 144–151. 14 indexed citations
10.
Riet, Jonathan van ‘t, Anthony D. Cox, Dena Cox, et al.. (2016). Does perceived risk influence the effects of message framing? Revisiting the link between prospect theory and message framing. Health Psychology Review. 10(4). 447–459. 56 indexed citations
11.
Crutzen, Rik, Jonathan van ‘t Riet, & Camille E. Short. (2015). Enjoyment: A Conceptual Exploration and Overview of Experimental Evidence in the Context of Games for Health. Games for Health Journal. 5(1). 15–20. 27 indexed citations
12.
Riet, Jonathan van ‘t & Rik Crutzen. (2014). How Effective are Active Videogames? Adding Meta-analyses to two Recent Systematic Reviews. European Health Psychologist. 16. 383. 1 indexed citations
13.
Riet, Jonathan van ‘t, Rik Crutzen, & Amy Shirong Lu. (2014). How Effective Are Active Videogames Among the Young and the Old? Adding Meta-analyses to Two Recent Systematic Reviews. Games for Health Journal. 3(5). 311–318. 20 indexed citations
14.
Riet, Jonathan van ‘t, et al.. (2013). Message frame and self-efficacy influence the persuasiveness of nutrition information in a fast-food restaurant. Food Quality and Preference. 29(1). 1–5. 12 indexed citations
15.
Riet, Jonathan van ‘t. (2012). Sales effects of product health information at points of purchase: a systematic review. Public Health Nutrition. 16(3). 418–429. 46 indexed citations
16.
Lauwere, Carolien de, et al.. (2011). Understanding farmers' decisions with regard to animal welfare: The case of changing to group housing for pregnant sows. Livestock Science. 143(2-3). 151–161. 59 indexed citations
17.
Riet, Jonathan van ‘t, S.J. Sijtsema, Hans Dagevos, & Gert‐Jan de Bruijn. (2011). The importance of habits in eating behaviour. An overview and recommendations for future research. Appetite. 57(3). 585–596. 289 indexed citations
18.
Riet, Jonathan van ‘t, Rik Crutzen, & Hein de Vries. (2010). Investigating Predictors of Visiting, Using, and Revisiting an Online Health-Communication Program: A Longitudinal Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 12(3). e37–e37. 78 indexed citations
19.
Vries, Hein de, Jonathan van ‘t Riet, Saadhna Panday, & Astrid Reubsaet. (2007). Access point analysis in smoking and nonsmoking adolescents: findings from the European Smoking Prevention Framework Approach study. European Journal of Cancer Prevention. 16(3). 257–265. 7 indexed citations
20.
Vries, Hein de, Jonathan van ‘t Riet, Mark Spigt, et al.. (2007). Clusters of lifestyle behaviors: Results from the Dutch SMILE study. Preventive Medicine. 46(3). 203–208. 167 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026