Jonathan Mellon

2.9k total citations · 1 hit paper
72 papers, 1.4k citations indexed

About

Jonathan Mellon is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science and Communication. According to data from OpenAlex, Jonathan Mellon has authored 72 papers receiving a total of 1.4k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 48 papers in Political Science and International Relations, 22 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 13 papers in Communication. Recurrent topics in Jonathan Mellon's work include Electoral Systems and Political Participation (33 papers), Social Policy and Reform Studies (16 papers) and Social Media and Politics (12 papers). Jonathan Mellon is often cited by papers focused on Electoral Systems and Political Participation (33 papers), Social Policy and Reform Studies (16 papers) and Social Media and Politics (12 papers). Jonathan Mellon collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Canada. Jonathan Mellon's co-authors include Christopher Prosser, Geoffrey Evans, Tiago Peixoto, Fredrik M. Sjöberg, Edward Fieldhouse, Jane Green, Geoffrey M. Evans, Cees van der Eijk, Hermann Schmitt and Paolo Spada and has published in prestigious journals such as American Political Science Review, American Journal of Political Science and Public Administration Review.

In The Last Decade

Jonathan Mellon

65 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Hit Papers

Twitter and Facebook are not representative of the genera... 2017 2026 2020 2023 2017 50 100 150 200 250

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Jonathan Mellon United Kingdom 18 674 603 310 112 98 72 1.4k
Nicole Curato Australia 18 596 0.9× 746 1.2× 503 1.6× 84 0.8× 60 0.6× 60 1.5k
John Wilkerson United States 19 774 1.1× 439 0.7× 165 0.5× 193 1.7× 258 2.6× 49 1.7k
Samuel J. Best United States 14 378 0.6× 571 0.9× 416 1.3× 75 0.7× 129 1.3× 32 1.1k
Brian S. Krueger United States 13 463 0.7× 749 1.2× 700 2.3× 123 1.1× 35 0.4× 29 1.2k
Michael Sances United States 16 515 0.8× 701 1.2× 162 0.5× 63 0.6× 248 2.5× 40 1.3k
Taylor C. Boas United States 18 755 1.1× 912 1.5× 314 1.0× 66 0.6× 194 2.0× 41 1.7k
Adam Glynn United States 15 309 0.5× 566 0.9× 169 0.5× 218 1.9× 213 2.2× 33 1.3k
Robert F. Rich United States 16 546 0.8× 787 1.3× 438 1.4× 107 1.0× 135 1.4× 47 1.7k
Fabio Rojas United States 14 360 0.5× 767 1.3× 388 1.3× 131 1.2× 27 0.3× 43 1.3k
Luigi Curini Italy 17 657 1.0× 614 1.0× 463 1.5× 278 2.5× 92 0.9× 66 1.4k

Countries citing papers authored by Jonathan Mellon

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jonathan Mellon's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jonathan Mellon with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jonathan Mellon more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jonathan Mellon

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jonathan Mellon. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jonathan Mellon. The network helps show where Jonathan Mellon may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jonathan Mellon

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jonathan Mellon. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jonathan Mellon based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jonathan Mellon. Jonathan Mellon is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Griffiths, J. D., Edward Fieldhouse, Christopher Prosser, et al.. (2025). The Brexit realignment amid electoral volatility: The role of party blocs in the 2024 General Election. Parliamentary Affairs. 79(1). 154–189.
2.
Leggett, C., et al.. (2025). Leveraging Artificial Intelligence for Cadet Education. 12(1). 7–12.
3.
Mellon, Jonathan, et al.. (2024). Do AIs know what the most important issue is? Using language models to code open-text social survey responses at scale. Research & Politics. 11(1). 22 indexed citations
4.
Fieldhouse, Edward, et al.. (2024). Who lacks voter identification? The electoral implications of the Elections Act 2022. Parliamentary Affairs.
5.
Mellon, Jonathan & Christopher Prosser. (2024). Regularized Regression Can Reintroduce Backdoor Confounding: The Case of Mass Polarization. American Political Science Review. 119(4). 2002–2010.
6.
Mellon, Jonathan. (2024). Rain, rain, go away: 194 potential exclusion‐restriction violations for studies using weather as an instrumental variable. American Journal of Political Science. 69(3). 881–898. 13 indexed citations
7.
Fieldhouse, Edward, et al.. (2023). Volatility, Realignment, and Electoral Shocks: Brexit and the UK General Election of 2019. PS Political Science & Politics. 56(4). 537–545. 6 indexed citations
8.
Mellon, Jonathan, et al.. (2022). The Haves and the Have Nots: Civic Technologies and the Pathways to Government Responsiveness. World Bank, Washington, DC eBooks. 3 indexed citations
9.
Mellon, Jonathan, et al.. (2021). Which Promises Actually Matter? Election Pledge Centrality and Promissory Representation. Political Studies. 71(3). 573–596. 7 indexed citations
10.
Mellon, Jonathan, et al.. (2021). How Do Coronavirus Attitudes Fit into Britain’s Ideological Landscape?. Parliamentary Affairs. 74(3). 597–616. 9 indexed citations
11.
Mellon, Jonathan. (2021). Tactical Voting and Electoral Pacts in the 2019 UK General Election. Political Studies Review. 20(3). 504–516. 4 indexed citations
12.
Hanretty, Chris, et al.. (2021). Members of Parliament are Minimally Accountable for Their Issue Stances (and They Know It). American Political Science Review. 115(4). 1275–1291. 11 indexed citations
13.
Fieldhouse, Edward, Jane Green, Geoffrey Evans, et al.. (2019). Electoral Shocks. 34 indexed citations
14.
Mellon, Jonathan, Geoffrey Evans, Edward Fieldhouse, Jane Green, & Christopher Prosser. (2018). Brexit or Corbyn? Campaign and Inter-Election Vote Switching in the 2017 UK General Election. Parliamentary Affairs. 71(4). 719–737. 39 indexed citations
15.
Prosser, Christopher & Jonathan Mellon. (2018). The Twilight of the Polls? A Review of Trends in Polling Accuracy and the Causes of Polling Misses. Government and Opposition. 53(4). 757–790. 38 indexed citations
16.
Mellon, Jonathan, Tiago Peixoto, & Fredrik M. Sjöberg. (2017). Does online voting change the outcome? Evidence from a multi-mode public policy referendum. Electoral Studies. 47. 13–24. 16 indexed citations
17.
Mellon, Jonathan. (2017). Making Inferences About Elections and Public Opinion Using Incidentally Collected Data. SSRN Electronic Journal. 522–533. 1 indexed citations
18.
Peixoto, Tiago, Fredrik M. Sjöberg, & Jonathan Mellon. (2017). A Get-Out-the-Vote Experiment on the World’s Largest Participatory Budgeting Vote in Brazil. British Journal of Political Science. 50(1). 381–389. 24 indexed citations
19.
Sjöberg, Fredrik M., Jonathan Mellon, & Tiago Peixoto. (2015). The Effect of Government Responsiveness on Future Political Participation. SSRN Electronic Journal. 13 indexed citations
20.
Hollway, James & Jonathan Mellon. (2014). Leading the Conversation: Comparing State Department Communication Networks Under Rogers and Kissinger. SSRN Electronic Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026