Jonathan Kastellec
- Law top 0.05%
- Economics and Econometrics top 2%
- Political Science and International Relations top 2%
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Strategy and Management top 10%
- Co-authors
- Eduardo L. LeoniJeffrey R. LaxTom ClarkJustin PhillipsAlexander V. HirschCharles M. CameronMichael MaleckiAndrew Gelman
- Topics
- Judicial and Constitutional Studies (46 papers)Legal and Constitutional Studies (31 papers)Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems (25 papers)
- Journals
- American Political Science ReviewAmerican Journal of Political ScienceThe Journal of Politics
- Partner nations
- United StatesSouth Korea
In The Last Decade
Jonathan Kastellec
51 papers receiving 901 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
- Law 684
- Economics and Econometrics 560
- Political Science and International Relations 377
- Sociology and Political Science 170
- Strategy and Management 100
Countries citing papers authored by Jonathan Kastellec
This map shows the geographic impact of Jonathan Kastellec's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jonathan Kastellec with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jonathan Kastellec more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jonathan Kastellec
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jonathan Kastellec. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jonathan Kastellec. The network helps show where Jonathan Kastellec may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jonathan Kastellec
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jonathan Kastellec. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jonathan Kastellec based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jonathan Kastellec. Jonathan Kastellec is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 6 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 4 | |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | 9 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | The Judicial Hierarchy: A Review Essay | 4 |
| 9 | 7 | |
| 10 | 15 | |
| 11 | 17 | |
| 12 | 21 | |
| 13 | 3 | |
| 14 | 6 | |
| 15 | 3 | |
| 16 | 31 | |
| 17 | 2 | |
| 18 | 7 | |
| 19 | 67 | |
| 20 | 4 |
About Jonathan Kastellec
Jonathan Kastellec is a scholar working on Law, Economics and Econometrics and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 55 papers that have together received 1000 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Judicial and Constitutional Studies (46 papers), Legal and Constitutional Studies (31 papers) and Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems (25 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Law (684 citations), Economics and Econometrics (560 citations) and Political Science and International Relations (377 citations). Jonathan Kastellec has collaborated with scholars based in United States and South Korea. Frequent co-authors include Eduardo L. Leoni, Jeffrey R. Lax, Tom Clark, Justin Phillips, Alexander V. Hirsch, Charles M. Cameron, Michael Malecki, Andrew Gelman, Sean Farhang and Gregory J. Wawro. Their work appears in journals such as American Political Science Review, American Journal of Political Science and The Journal of Politics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.