Jonathan Intravia
- Sociology and Political Science top 2%
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Political Science and International Relations top 5%
- General Health Professions top 10%
- Health top 10%
- Co-authors
- Kevin T. WolffAlex R. PiqueroMichael T. BaglivioJustin T. PickettNicole Leeper PiqueroEric A. StewartNathan EppsPatricia Y. Warren
- Topics
- Crime Patterns and Interventions (23 papers)Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (9 papers)Policing Practices and Perceptions (8 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesAustralia
In The Last Decade
Jonathan Intravia
32 papers receiving 697 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
- Sociology and Political Science 552
- Clinical Psychology 210
- Political Science and International Relations 183
- General Health Professions 127
- Health 86
Countries citing papers authored by Jonathan Intravia
This map shows the geographic impact of Jonathan Intravia's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jonathan Intravia with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jonathan Intravia more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jonathan Intravia
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jonathan Intravia. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jonathan Intravia. The network helps show where Jonathan Intravia may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jonathan Intravia
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jonathan Intravia. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jonathan Intravia based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jonathan Intravia. Jonathan Intravia is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 12 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 4 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 4 | |
| 8 | 2 | |
| 9 | 15 | |
| 10 | 5 | |
| 11 | 63 | |
| 12 | 14 | |
| 13 | 18 | |
| 14 | 68 | |
| 15 | 36 | |
| 16 | 21 | |
| 17 | 44 | |
| 18 | 32 | |
| 19 | 34 | |
| 20 | 24 |
About Jonathan Intravia
Jonathan Intravia is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Gender Studies and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 34 papers that have together received 725 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Crime Patterns and Interventions (23 papers), Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (9 papers) and Policing Practices and Perceptions (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Sociology and Political Science (552 citations), Health (86 citations) and Clinical Psychology (210 citations). Jonathan Intravia has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Kevin T. Wolff, Alex R. Piquero, Michael T. Baglivio, Justin T. Pickett, Nicole Leeper Piquero, Eric A. Stewart, Nathan Epps, Patricia Y. Warren, Ronald L. Simons and Andrew J. Thompson. Their work appears in journals such as Computers in Human Behavior, Criminology and Journal of Youth and Adolescence.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.