Jonathan Gower

409 total citations
9 papers, 228 citations indexed

About

Jonathan Gower is a scholar working on Surgery, General Health Professions and Nature and Landscape Conservation. According to data from OpenAlex, Jonathan Gower has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 228 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 3 papers in Surgery, 2 papers in General Health Professions and 1 paper in Nature and Landscape Conservation. Recurrent topics in Jonathan Gower's work include Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research (1 paper), Ancient Egypt and Archaeology (1 paper) and Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (1 paper). Jonathan Gower is often cited by papers focused on Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research (1 paper), Ancient Egypt and Archaeology (1 paper) and Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (1 paper). Jonathan Gower collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Netherlands. Jonathan Gower's co-authors include Jan Poloniecki, Baris Ata Ozdemir, Matt Thompson, Annette Boaz, Sidhartha Sinha, Peter Holt, Alan Karthikesalingam, Robert J. Hinchliffe, Brian J. Rehill and Yangjian Zhang and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, BMJ Open and The Bone & Joint Journal.

In The Last Decade

Jonathan Gower

9 papers receiving 214 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Jonathan Gower United Kingdom 5 85 77 35 29 24 9 228
Karen L. Nelson United States 8 38 0.4× 15 0.2× 49 1.4× 16 0.6× 34 1.4× 16 315
P.O. Lafontaine France 9 50 0.6× 99 1.3× 8 0.2× 7 0.2× 18 0.8× 21 457
Peter W. Wood Canada 12 58 0.7× 39 0.5× 45 1.3× 27 0.9× 21 0.9× 29 504
M. Williams United Kingdom 11 34 0.4× 73 0.9× 14 0.4× 6 0.2× 66 2.8× 19 468
Alena Tofte United States 5 21 0.2× 26 0.3× 9 0.3× 84 2.9× 33 1.4× 5 547
Peter‐Marc Fortune United Kingdom 11 29 0.3× 63 0.8× 61 1.7× 4 0.1× 35 1.5× 22 495
Gustavo Pastelín Hernández Mexico 10 76 0.9× 62 0.8× 19 0.5× 64 2.2× 49 2.0× 24 456
Jenny Ericson Sweden 13 26 0.3× 56 0.7× 20 0.6× 50 1.7× 50 2.1× 28 423
M. A. Cunningham United States 9 37 0.4× 80 1.0× 15 0.4× 5 0.2× 20 0.8× 20 315
Stephanie M. Harris United Kingdom 8 34 0.4× 11 0.1× 75 2.1× 21 0.7× 127 5.3× 18 233

Countries citing papers authored by Jonathan Gower

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jonathan Gower's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jonathan Gower with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jonathan Gower more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jonathan Gower

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jonathan Gower. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jonathan Gower. The network helps show where Jonathan Gower may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jonathan Gower

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jonathan Gower. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jonathan Gower based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jonathan Gower. Jonathan Gower is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
1.
Nicolaou, N., et al.. (2024). Future research priorities for soft-tissue knee injuries. The Bone & Joint Journal. 106-B(3). 232–239. 4 indexed citations
2.
Divall, Pip, Amar Rangan, Marcus Bateman, et al.. (2022). Elbow conditions: research priorities setting in partnership with the James Lind Alliance. BMJ Open. 12(11). e062177–e062177. 2 indexed citations
3.
Feltz‐Cornelis, Christina M. van der, Mark J. Edwards, Nicholas Gall, et al.. (2022). Identifying the top research priorities in medically not yet explained symptoms (MNYES): a James Lind Alliance priority setting partnership. BMJ Open. 12(7). e061263–e061263. 8 indexed citations
4.
Bretherton, Chris, H A Claireaux, Jonathan Gower, et al.. (2021). Research priorities for the management of complex fractures: a UK priority setting partnership with the James Lind Alliance. BMJ Open. 11(11). e057198–e057198. 7 indexed citations
5.
Ozdemir, Baris Ata, Alan Karthikesalingam, Sidhartha Sinha, et al.. (2015). Research Activity and the Association with Mortality. PLoS ONE. 10(2). e0118253–e0118253. 136 indexed citations
6.
Hull, Mark A., Yan Yiannakou, Jonathan Gower, et al.. (2012). Getting involved in clinical trials research in the UK: how can Clinical Research Networks help?. Frontline Gastroenterology. 3(2). 66–71. 1 indexed citations
7.
Adams, Jonathan M., Brian J. Rehill, Yangjian Zhang, & Jonathan Gower. (2008). A test of the latitudinal defense hypothesis: herbivory, tannins and total phenolics in four North American tree species. Ecological Research. 24(3). 697–704. 51 indexed citations
8.
Wright, Katherine, et al.. (1998). The Wadi Faynan Fourth and Third Millennia Project, 1997: Report on the First Season of Test Excavations at Wadi Faynan 100. Levant. 30(1). 33–60. 15 indexed citations
9.
Goddard, John, Jonathan Gower, & Colin J. Green. (1992). A Chelator is Required for Microsomal LIPID Peroxidation Following Reductive Ferritin-Iron Mobilisation. Free Radical Research Communications. 17(3). 177–185. 4 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026