Jonathan Coopersmith

579 citations
34 papers · 310 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Jonathan Coopersmith

28 papers receiving 225 citations

Peers

Jonathan Coopersmith
Comparison fields: 5 of 100
  • History and Philosophy of Science 46
  • Political Science and International Relations 89
  • Gender Studies 27
  • Sociology and Political Science 92
  • Computer Science Applications 10
Replace Joseph J. Corn with:
Joseph J. Corn United States
W. David Lewis United States
G. Pascal Zachary United States
Tim Hitchcock United Kingdom
Georg Franck Austria
Fred R. Shapiro United States
Tom Standage
Alun C. Davies United Kingdom
Susan Smulyan United States
Darin Barney Canada
Jonathan Coopersmith relative to Joseph J. Corn United States Joseph J. Corn's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Joseph J. Corn · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jonathan Coopersmith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jonathan Coopersmith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jonathan Coopersmith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jonathan Coopersmith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jonathan Coopersmith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jonathan Coopersmith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jonathan Coopersmith. The network helps show where Jonathan Coopersmith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 7 scholars most cited alongside Jonathan Coopersmith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jonathan Coopersmith Line = papers co-authored together Jonathan Coopersmith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199487
2 199537
3 200029
4 199322
5 200617
6 199317
7 199417
8 201114
9 19967
10 20037
11 20107
12 19936
13 19915
14 20174
15 20004
16
When Worlds Collide: Government and Electrification, 1892-1939
20044
17 20164
18 20164
19 20063
20 19832

About Jonathan Coopersmith

Jonathan Coopersmith is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, History and Philosophy of Science, Astronomy and Astrophysics, Clinical Psychology and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 34 papers that have together received 310 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Twentieth Century Scientific Developments (3 papers), Russia and Soviet political economy (3 papers), History of Science and Medicine (3 papers), Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology (3 papers), Spacecraft Design and Technology (2 papers), Digital Platforms and Economics (2 papers), Nuclear Issues and Defense (2 papers) and ICT Impact and Policies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (46 citations), Political Science and International Relations (89 citations), Gender Studies (27 citations), Sociology and Political Science (92 citations) and Computer Science Applications (10 citations). Jonathan Coopersmith has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and China. Frequent co-authors include Loren R. Graham, David Holloway, Daniel Brower, Julian Cooper, David R. Shearer, Clive Trebilcock and Benjamin Gross. Their work appears in journals such as Technology and Culture, The Russian Review, IEEE Technology and Society Magazine, The American Historical Review and Journal of American History.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact