Jonathan Clough

734 total citations
31 papers, 327 citations indexed

About

Jonathan Clough is a scholar working on Law, Sociology and Political Science and Information Systems. According to data from OpenAlex, Jonathan Clough has authored 31 papers receiving a total of 327 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 13 papers in Law, 11 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 8 papers in Information Systems. Recurrent topics in Jonathan Clough's work include Jury Decision Making Processes (11 papers), Law in Society and Culture (8 papers) and Cybercrime and Law Enforcement Studies (8 papers). Jonathan Clough is often cited by papers focused on Jury Decision Making Processes (11 papers), Law in Society and Culture (8 papers) and Cybercrime and Law Enforcement Studies (8 papers). Jonathan Clough collaborates with scholars based in Australia, New Zealand and Canada. Jonathan Clough's co-authors include James R. P. Ogloff, Jane Goodman‐Delahunty, Jonathan Liberman, Warren Young, Benjamin Spivak, Stuart Thomas, Neil Brewer, Paul E. Mullen, Jacqueline Horan and Stefan Luebbers and has published in prestigious journals such as Social Science Quarterly, Behavioral Sciences & the Law and Sexual Abuse.

In The Last Decade

Jonathan Clough

30 papers receiving 290 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Jonathan Clough Australia	11	184	109	108	51	45	31	327
K. Jaishankar India	14	255 1.4×	171 1.6×	63 0.6×	32 0.6×	16 0.4×	33	406
Stefano Caneppele Switzerland	13	311 1.7×	108 1.0×	62 0.6×	25 0.5×	12 0.3×	43	412
Brigitte Bouhours Australia	10	280 1.5×	49 0.4×	96 0.9×	52 1.0×	54 1.2×	28	423
Mary Anne Franks United States	8	137 0.7×	37 0.3×	106 1.0×	25 0.5×	47 1.0×	31	281
Russell Brewer Australia	11	260 1.4×	145 1.3×	37 0.3×	66 1.3×	9 0.2×	23	349
Simon Bronitt Australia	10	159 0.9×	34 0.3×	31 0.3×	115 2.3×	92 2.0×	71	301
William B. Sanders United States	11	195 1.1×	27 0.2×	42 0.4×	25 0.5×	11 0.2×	31	306
Meghan E. Hollis United States	9	229 1.2×	55 0.5×	28 0.3×	67 1.3×	6 0.1×	22	296
Nancy E. Marion United States	12	293 1.6×	37 0.3×	25 0.2×	195 3.8×	28 0.6×	41	398
Diarmaid Harkin Australia	9	226 1.2×	91 0.8×	18 0.2×	132 2.6×	10 0.2×	27	288

Countries citing papers authored by Jonathan Clough

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jonathan Clough's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jonathan Clough with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jonathan Clough more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jonathan Clough

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jonathan Clough. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jonathan Clough. The network helps show where Jonathan Clough may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jonathan Clough

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jonathan Clough. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jonathan Clough based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jonathan Clough. Jonathan Clough is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Clough, Jonathan. (2019). A World of Difference: The Budapest Convention on Cybercrime and the Challenges of Harmonisation. SSRN Electronic Journal. 40(3). 698–736. 11 indexed citations

Clough, Jonathan. (2019). Lawful Acts, Unlawful Images: The Problematic Definition of ‘Child' Pornography. Figshare. 38(3). 213–245. 4 indexed citations

Spivak, Benjamin, James R. P. Ogloff, & Jonathan Clough. (2018). Asking the Right Questions: Examining the Efficacy of Question Trails as a Method of Improving Lay Comprehension and Application of Legal Concepts. Psychiatry Psychology and Law. 26(3). 441–456. 5 indexed citations

Ogloff, James R. P., et al.. (2018). Demographic, mental health, and offending characteristics of online child exploitation material offenders: A comparison with contact‐only and dual sexual offenders. Behavioral Sciences & the Law. 36(2). 198–215. 19 indexed citations

Clough, Jonathan, et al.. (2018). The judge as cartographer and guide: the role of fact-based directions in improving juror comprehension. Swinburne Research Bank (Swinburne University of Technology). 42(5). 278–297. 3 indexed citations

Clough, Jonathan. (2015). Possession of ‘‘Extreme” Pornography: Where’s the Harm?. eYLS (Yale Law School). 13(2). 131–169. 1 indexed citations

Ogloff, James R. P., et al.. (2015). Looking Beyond the Screen: A Critical Review of the Literature on the Online Child Pornography Offender. Sexual Abuse. 29(5). 416–445. 59 indexed citations

Sivasubramaniam, Diane, et al.. (2015). Jurors' consideration of inadmissible evidence: a motivational explanation. Swinburne Research Bank (Swinburne University of Technology). 24(3). 154–171. 2 indexed citations

Clough, Jonathan. (2015). Principles of Cybercrime. Cambridge University Press eBooks. 62 indexed citations

10.

Clough, Jonathan. (2011). Data Theft? Cybercrime and the Increasing Criminalization of Access to Data. Criminal Law Forum. 22(1-2). 145–170. 11 indexed citations

11.

Goodman‐Delahunty, Jane, et al.. (2008). Factors affecting juror satisfaction and confidence in New South Wales, Victoria and South Australia. Trends and issues in crime and criminal justice. 1–6. 11 indexed citations

12.

Ogloff, James R. P., et al.. (2008). What are we doing here? An analysis of juror orientation programs. Swinburne Research Bank (Swinburne University of Technology). 92(2). 70–77. 1 indexed citations

13.

Goodman‐Delahunty, Jane, Neil Brewer, Jonathan Clough, et al.. (2008). Practices, policies and procedures that influence juror satisfaction in Australia. SSRN Electronic Journal. 6 indexed citations

14.

Clough, Jonathan. (2008). Punishing the Parent: Corporate Criminal Complicity in Human Rights Abuses. Brooklyn journal of international law. 33(3). 4. 6 indexed citations

15.

Clough, Jonathan, et al.. (2008). In your own words: A survey of judicial attitudes to jury communication. 18(2). 65–84. 2 indexed citations

16.

Clough, Jonathan. (2007). Bridging the Theoretical Gap: The Search for a Realist Model of Corporate Criminal Liability. Criminal Law Forum. 18(3-4). 267–300. 13 indexed citations

17.

Ogloff, James R. P., Jonathan Clough, & Jane Goodman‐Delahunty. (2007). Enhancing communication with Australian and New Zealand juries: A survey of judges. 16(4). 235–255. 1 indexed citations

18.

Ogloff, James R. P., Jonathan Clough, Jane Goodman‐Delahunty, & Warren Young. (2006). The jury project: stage 1 - A survey of Australian and New Zealand judges. 7 indexed citations

19.

Liberman, Jonathan & Jonathan Clough. (2002). Corporations that kill: the criminal liability of tobacco manufacturers. 26(4). 223–236. 10 indexed citations

20.

Clough, Jonathan. (2000). Section 398A of the Crimes Act 1958 (Vic): Pfennig resurrected?. 24(1). 8–20. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact