Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Racial Differences in the Cause-Specific Prevalence of Blindness in East Baltimore
1991612 citationsAlfred Sommer, James M. Tielsch et al.profile →
Countries citing papers authored by Jonathan C. Javitt
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Jonathan C. Javitt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jonathan C. Javitt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jonathan C. Javitt more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jonathan C. Javitt
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jonathan C. Javitt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jonathan C. Javitt. The network helps show where Jonathan C. Javitt may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jonathan C. Javitt
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jonathan C. Javitt.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jonathan C. Javitt based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Jonathan C. Javitt. Jonathan C. Javitt is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Javitt, Jonathan C.. (2009). Seroprevalencia de la Brucelosis en Pequeños Rumiantes. Municipio Torres. Año 2008. REDVET. Revista Electrónica de Veterinaria. 10(8).1 indexed citations
4.
Javitt, Jonathan C., Gergana Zlateva, Sorrel Wolowacz, & Andreas M. Pleil. (2007). Balancing Visual Acuity Benefits With Systemic Adverse Effects in Anti-VEGF Therapy. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 48(13). 2106–2106.1 indexed citations
Shah, Steven N., Gergana Zlateva, Steve Zhou, & Jonathan C. Javitt. (2006). Comparison of Comorbid Conditions Between Wet AMD Patients and a Control Cohort in the Medicare Population. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 47(13). 2209–2209.2 indexed citations
7.
Zhou, Steve, Jonathan C. Javitt, Gergana Zlateva, & Steven N. Shah. (2006). Evaluating the Risk of Mortality for Exudative (Wet) AMD Patients Compared to a Control Group. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 47(13). 2213–2213.4 indexed citations
Javitt, Jonathan C., et al.. (1996). Measuring the impact of glaucoma and its treatment on quality of life: The glaucoma disability index. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 37(3).4 indexed citations
10.
Javitt, Jonathan C., Earl P. Steinberg, Phoebe D. Sharkey, et al.. (1995). Cataract Surgery in One Eye or Both. Ophthalmology. 102(11). 1583–1593.89 indexed citations
Javitt, Jonathan C., Debra Street, James M. Tielsch, et al.. (1994). National Outcomes of Cataract Extraction. Ophthalmology. 101(1). 100–106.308 indexed citations
Javitt, Jonathan C.. (1986). Computers in Medicine: Applications and Possibilities. Saunders eBooks.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.