Jonathan Auerbach

27 papers receiving 236 citations

Peers

Jonathan Auerbach
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts 26
  • Health 14
  • Literature and Literary Theory 13
  • Sociology and Political Science 31
  • Cultural Studies 5
Replace M. C. Jȩdrej with:
M. C. Jȩdrej United Kingdom
Michael Dietler United States
Eugenia W. Herbert United States
Ruth Murray Underhill United States
Alain United Arab Emirates
Janet Browne United States
Sin Autor
Darcy Ribeiro Brazil
Lindy A. Orthia Australia
Timothy Insoll United Kingdom
Jonathan Auerbach relative to M. C. Jȩdrej United Kingdom M. C. Jȩdrej's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×8×
M. C. Jȩdrej · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jonathan Auerbach

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jonathan Auerbach's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jonathan Auerbach with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jonathan Auerbach more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jonathan Auerbach

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jonathan Auerbach. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jonathan Auerbach. The network helps show where Jonathan Auerbach may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jonathan Auerbach, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jonathan Auerbach Line = papers co-authored together Jonathan Auerbach links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201364
2 201648
3 202143
4
Male Call: Becoming Jack London
199622
5 202219
6 200616
7 201616
8 201813
9 200011
10
Body Shots: Early Cinema’s Incarnations
200711
11 198010
12 200710
13 20149
14 20189
15 19946
16 20206
17 19974
18 19994
19 20214
20 20082

About Jonathan Auerbach

Jonathan Auerbach is a scholar working on Visual Arts and Performing Arts, Literature and Literary Theory, Genetics, Political Science and International Relations and Health, having authored 34 papers that have together received 342 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cinema History and Criticism (7 papers), American and British Literature Analysis (4 papers), Genetic Associations and Epidemiology (4 papers), Electoral Systems and Political Participation (2 papers), Political Theory and Democracy (1 paper), Policing Practices and Perceptions (1 paper), Statistics Education and Methodologies (1 paper) and Gun Ownership and Violence Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Visual Arts and Performing Arts (26 citations), Health (14 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (13 citations), Sociology and Political Science (31 citations) and Cultural Studies (5 citations). Jonathan Auerbach has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Andrew Gelman, Ignacio Morales‐Castilla, E. M. Wolkovich, Ailene K. Ettinger, Yair Ghitza, Daniel M. Buonaiuto, C. J. Chamberlain, Owen Rambow, Kevin Li and Desmond U. Patton. Their work appears in journals such as American Literature, American Quarterly, BMC Genetics, American Literary History and Resources for American Literary Study.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact