Jonathan Ache Dias
About
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jonathan Ache Dias
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jonathan Ache Dias. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jonathan Ache Dias based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jonathan Ache Dias. Jonathan Ache Dias is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Jonathan Ache Dias
36 papers receiving 597 citations
Fields of papers citing papers by Jonathan Ache Dias
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jonathan Ache Dias. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jonathan Ache Dias. The network helps show where Jonathan Ache Dias may publish in the future.
Countries citing papers authored by Jonathan Ache Dias
This map shows the geographic impact of Jonathan Ache Dias's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jonathan Ache Dias with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jonathan Ache Dias more than expected).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.