Jon K. Piper

557 citations
30 papers · 404 indexed · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Jon K. Piper

26 papers receiving 316 citations

Peers

Jon K. Piper
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 173
  • Forestry 41
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 96
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 133
  • Soil Science 46
Replace B. Krautzer with:
B. Krautzer Austria
Margareta Hansson Sweden
T. A. Watt United Kingdom
RF Brown Australia
R. Chadœuf France
Carlos B. Passera Argentina
L. R. Benjamin United Kingdom
P. E. Kaye Australia
Ichiroku Hayashi Japan
Laura José‐María Spain
Jon K. Piper relative to B. Krautzer Austria B. Krautzer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
B. Krautzer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jon K. Piper

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jon K. Piper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jon K. Piper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jon K. Piper more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jon K. Piper

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jon K. Piper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jon K. Piper. The network helps show where Jon K. Piper may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 5 scholars most cited alongside Jon K. Piper, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jon K. Piper Line = papers co-authored together Jon K. Piper links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1
Recruiting STEM Students with Brief Summer Research Experiences: An Opportunity for Colleges and Their Alumni
20172
2 20172
3
STEM Learning Community: An Interdisciplinary Seminar for First- and Second-year College Science Majors
20152
4 20143
5 200739
6 20071
7 20052
8 20057
9 199823
10 19967
11 19968
12 19943
13 19938
14
A Grain Agriculture Fashioned in Nature’s Image: The Work of the Land Institute
19935
15 199213
16
VEGETATION DYNAMICS OF THREE TALLGRASS PRAIRIE SITES
19891
17 19899
18 198958
19 198621
20 19863

About Jon K. Piper

Jon K. Piper is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Agronomy and Crop Science, Forestry, Plant Science and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, having authored 30 papers that have together received 404 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (11 papers), Botany, Ecology, and Taxonomy Studies (10 papers), Rangeland and Wildlife Management (7 papers), Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems (6 papers), Plant and animal studies (6 papers), Seedling growth and survival studies (5 papers), Plant Parasitism and Resistance (4 papers) and Turfgrass Adaptation and Management (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (173 citations), Forestry (41 citations), Agronomy and Crop Science (96 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (133 citations) and Soil Science (46 citations). Jon K. Piper has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Wes Jackson, Peter Kulakow, Stuart L. Pimm, Dwight Krehbiel and Richard P. Zerger. Their work appears in journals such as Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment, American Journal of Botany, Community Ecology, Field Crops Research and Oikos.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026