Jon J. Ford

1.8k citations
63 papers · 1.0k · h-index 19

Impact in

Papers in

Jon J. Ford

52 papers receiving 994 citations

Peers

Jon J. Ford
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
  • Pharmacology 738
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 443
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 99
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 162
  • Cell Biology 169
Replace Ronald Donelson with:
Ronald Donelson United States
Rebecca J. Crawford Australia
Mohammadreza Pourahmadi Iran
Patrícia do Carmo Silva Parreira Australia
Paul Glynn United States
Michael T. Cibulka United States
C.G. Greenough United Kingdom
Fouad Fayad France
Christopher J. Standaert United States
Daniel Câmara Azevedo Brazil
Jon J. Ford relative to Ronald Donelson United States Ronald Donelson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×8.3×
Ronald Donelson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jon J. Ford

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jon J. Ford's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jon J. Ford with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jon J. Ford more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jon J. Ford

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jon J. Ford. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jon J. Ford. The network helps show where Jon J. Ford may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jon J. Ford, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jon J. Ford Line = papers co-authored together Jon J. Ford links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 63 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2010143
2 201754
3 201550
4 201350
5 201247
6 201244
7 200742
8 200742
9 201540
10 202031
11 201128
12 201124
13 201223
14 201521
15 200721
16
Mechanical integrity of subchondral bone in osteochondral autografts and allografts.
199821
17 201720
18 201219
19 201118
20 202017

About Jon J. Ford

Jon J. Ford is a scholar working on Pharmacology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Surgery, Psychiatry and Mental health and Cell Biology, having authored 63 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (50 papers), Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (29 papers), Myofascial pain diagnosis and treatment (11 papers), Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research (11 papers), Shoulder Injury and Treatment (10 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (10 papers), Sports injuries and prevention (9 papers) and Shoulder and Clavicle Injuries (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacology (738 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (443 citations), Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (99 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (162 citations) and Cell Biology (169 citations). Jon J. Ford has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Germany and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Andrew J. Hahne, Joan McMeeken, Luke D. Surkitt, Tania Pizzari, Lyn Watson, Sarah Warby, Nicholas F. Taylor, Ian Story, Peter O’Sullivan and Rana S. Hinman. Their work appears in journals such as Physical Therapy Reviews, BMJ Open, Spine, BMJ Open Sport & Exercise Medicine and Physiotherapy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact