Jon Chamberlain

1.7k citations
53 papers · 928 · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Jon Chamberlain

51 papers receiving 853 citations

Peers

Jon Chamberlain
Comparison fields: 5 of 108
  • Computer Science Applications 161
  • Oceanography 173
  • Artificial Intelligence 428
  • Global and Planetary Change 282
  • Aquatic Science 61
Replace Eleanor O’Rourke with:
Eleanor O’Rourke United States
Anselmo Peñas Spain
Michael Piotrowski Switzerland
Philippe Grosjean Belgium
Kara Woo United States
Christopher D. Miller United States
Ann Zimmerman United States
Rubén Lara United States
Wei Gu China
Lúcia Pombo Portugal
Jon Chamberlain relative to Eleanor O’Rourke United States Eleanor O’Rourke's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×20.3×
Eleanor O’Rourke · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jon Chamberlain

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jon Chamberlain's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jon Chamberlain with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jon Chamberlain more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jon Chamberlain

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jon Chamberlain. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jon Chamberlain. The network helps show where Jon Chamberlain may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jon Chamberlain, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jon Chamberlain Line = papers co-authored together Jon Chamberlain links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 53 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2001157
2 2008100
3 201359
4 200754
5
Phrase Detectives: A Web-based collaborative annotation game
200854
6 201851
7 201940
8 201738
9 201934
10 201832
11 202119
12 201419
13 201116
14 200815
15 200915
16 195915
17 200914
18 201814
19 201613
20 200813

About Jon Chamberlain

Jon Chamberlain is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Computer Science Applications, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Information Systems and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 53 papers that have together received 928 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Natural Language Processing Techniques (17 papers), Topic Modeling (17 papers), Speech and dialogue systems (16 papers), Mobile Crowdsensing and Crowdsourcing (16 papers), Multimodal Machine Learning Applications (5 papers), Data Visualization and Analytics (4 papers), Information Retrieval and Search Behavior (4 papers) and Semantic Web and Ontologies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Science Applications (161 citations), Oceanography (173 citations), Artificial Intelligence (428 citations), Global and Planetary Change (282 citations) and Aquatic Science (61 citations). Jon Chamberlain has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Italy and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Udo Kruschwitz, Massimo Poesio, Tony Russell‐Rose, Dario Stucchi, Silviu Paun, Christopher W. McKindsey, Andréa M. Weise, Philippe Archambault, Myriam D. Callier and Chris J Cromey. Their work appears in journals such as Language Resources and Evaluation, Aquaculture, Aquatic Toxicology, Marine Pollution Bulletin and ICES Journal of Marine Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact