JoLyn Tatum
About
In The Last Decade
JoLyn Tatum
11 papers receiving 596 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 349
- Clinical Psychology 266
- Cognitive Neuroscience 171
- Social Psychology 114
- General Health Professions 98
Countries citing papers authored by JoLyn Tatum
This map shows the geographic impact of JoLyn Tatum's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by JoLyn Tatum with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites JoLyn Tatum more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by JoLyn Tatum
This network shows the impact of papers produced by JoLyn Tatum. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by JoLyn Tatum. The network helps show where JoLyn Tatum may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of JoLyn Tatum
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of JoLyn Tatum. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of JoLyn Tatum based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with JoLyn Tatum. JoLyn Tatum is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 7 | |
| 2 | 9 | |
| 3 | 4 | |
| 4 | 9 | |
| 5 | 93 | |
| 6 | 36 | |
| 7 | 16 | |
| 8 | 51 | |
| 9 | 36 | |
| 10 | 247 | |
| 11 | 113 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.