Joice John
Impact in
-
- Monetary Policy and Economic Impact
- Economic Theory and Policy
- Economics and Econometrics top 5%
- Market Dynamics and Volatility
- Economic theories and models
- Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth
- Economic Growth and Productivity
Papers in
-
- Monetary Policy and Economic Impact 7
- Economic Theory and Policy 2
- Finance 6
- Global Financial Crisis and Policies 6
- Banking stability, regulation, efficiency 1
- Co-authors
- Rafael Portillo (2 shared papers)Hou Wang (3 shared papers)Ondra Kamenik (3 shared papers)Kevin Clinton (3 shared papers)Douglas Laxton (3 shared papers)Pranav Gupta (2 shared papers)Fan Zhang (3 shared papers)Jaromír Beneš (3 shared papers)
- Journals
- American Economic Review (1 paper)Indian Economic Review (1 paper)Journal of Asian Economics (1 paper)The Singapore Economic Review (1 paper)IMF Working Paper (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- IndiaUnited StatesCanada
In The Last Decade
Joice John
8 papers receiving 251 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 25
- General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 271
- Economics and Econometrics 260
- Finance 80
- General Decision Sciences 3
- Accounting 12
Countries citing papers authored by Joice John
This map shows the geographic impact of Joice John's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joice John with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joice John more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Joice John
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joice John. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joice John. The network helps show where Joice John may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 8 scholars most cited alongside Joice John, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | LONG-RUN NEUTRALITY AND SUPERNEUTRALITY IN AN ARIMA FRAMEWORK | 1993 | 218 |
| 2 | 2014 | 60 | |
| 3 | 2017 | 8 | |
| 4 | 2017 | 5 | |
| 5 | 2017 | 4 | |
| 6 | 2015 | 4 | |
| 7 | 2020 | 2 | |
| 8 | A Comparative Study on Private Consumption Expenditure Estimates in India | 2007 | 2 |
About Joice John
Joice John is a scholar working on General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, Finance, Economics and Econometrics, Sociology and Political Science and General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, having authored 8 papers that have together received 303 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Monetary Policy and Economic Impact (7 papers), Global Financial Crisis and Policies (6 papers), Market Dynamics and Volatility (3 papers), Economic Theory and Policy (2 papers), Agricultural Economics and Practices (1 paper), Economic Policies and Impacts (1 paper), Indian Economic and Social Development (1 paper) and Banking stability, regulation, efficiency (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (271 citations), Economics and Econometrics (260 citations), Finance (80 citations), General Decision Sciences (3 citations) and Accounting (12 citations). Joice John has collaborated with scholars based in India, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Rafael Portillo, Hou Wang, Ondra Kamenik, Kevin Clinton, Douglas Laxton, Pranav Gupta, Fan Zhang and Jaromír Beneš. Their work appears in journals such as American Economic Review, Indian Economic Review, Journal of Asian Economics, The Singapore Economic Review and IMF Working Paper.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.