Nathaniel A. Throckmorton

596 total citations
26 papers, 286 citations indexed

About

Nathaniel A. Throckmorton is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, General Economics, Econometrics and Finance and Finance. According to data from OpenAlex, Nathaniel A. Throckmorton has authored 26 papers receiving a total of 286 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 25 papers in Economics and Econometrics, 24 papers in General Economics, Econometrics and Finance and 5 papers in Finance. Recurrent topics in Nathaniel A. Throckmorton's work include Monetary Policy and Economic Impact (23 papers), Market Dynamics and Volatility (13 papers) and Economic theories and models (10 papers). Nathaniel A. Throckmorton is often cited by papers focused on Monetary Policy and Economic Impact (23 papers), Market Dynamics and Volatility (13 papers) and Economic theories and models (10 papers). Nathaniel A. Throckmorton collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Germany. Nathaniel A. Throckmorton's co-authors include Alexander W. Richter, Todd B. Walker, Benjamin D. Keen, Michael Kumhof, Romain G. Rancière, William T. Gavin, Michael Plante and Joshua Bernstein and has published in prestigious journals such as Econometrica, Journal of Monetary Economics and European Economic Review.

In The Last Decade

Nathaniel A. Throckmorton

25 papers receiving 261 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Nathaniel A. Throckmorton United States	8	228	223	95	19	13	26	286
Steffen Henzel Germany	8	186 0.8×	233 1.0×	72 0.8×	8 0.4×	6 0.5×	39	268
Lorenza Rossi Italy	12	252 1.1×	296 1.3×	64 0.7×	10 0.5×	10 0.8×	38	340
Paúl Castillo Peru	10	167 0.7×	191 0.9×	101 1.1×	6 0.3×	18 1.4×	24	237
Saeed Zaman United States	9	156 0.7×	170 0.8×	75 0.8×	7 0.4×	20 1.5×	40	222
Jeremy J. Nalewaik United States	9	201 0.9×	206 0.9×	69 0.7×	7 0.4×	10 0.8×	31	281
Christoph Thoenissen United Kingdom	11	310 1.4×	287 1.3×	191 2.0×	10 0.5×	6 0.5×	28	385
Gabriela Nodari Australia	7	276 1.2×	343 1.5×	63 0.7×	9 0.5×	24 1.8×	19	373
Klodiana Istrefi France	8	174 0.8×	194 0.9×	95 1.0×	18 0.9×	11 0.8×	24	246
Alessandro Galesi Spain	9	261 1.1×	267 1.2×	195 2.1×	8 0.4×	13 1.0×	15	378
Iris Biefang‐Frisancho Mariscal United Kingdom	9	201 0.9×	210 0.9×	51 0.5×	15 0.8×	5 0.4×	19	256

Countries citing papers authored by Nathaniel A. Throckmorton

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nathaniel A. Throckmorton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nathaniel A. Throckmorton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nathaniel A. Throckmorton more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nathaniel A. Throckmorton

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nathaniel A. Throckmorton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nathaniel A. Throckmorton. The network helps show where Nathaniel A. Throckmorton may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nathaniel A. Throckmorton

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nathaniel A. Throckmorton. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nathaniel A. Throckmorton based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nathaniel A. Throckmorton. Nathaniel A. Throckmorton is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Bernstein, Joshua, et al.. (2024). A Simple Explanation of Countercyclical Uncertainty. American Economic Journal Macroeconomics. 16(4). 143–171. 1 indexed citations

Bernstein, Joshua, Alexander W. Richter, & Nathaniel A. Throckmorton. (2023). The Matching Function and Nonlinear Business Cycles. Journal of money credit and banking. 57(2-3). 349–376. 1 indexed citations

Plante, Michael, et al.. (2021). Complementarity and macroeconomic uncertainty. Review of Economic Dynamics. 44. 225–243. 4 indexed citations

Bernstein, Joshua, et al.. (2021). Countercyclical Fluctuations in Uncertainty are Endogenous. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas, Working Papers. 2021(2109). 2 indexed citations

Richter, Alexander W., et al.. (2019). The zero lower bound and estimation accuracy. Journal of Monetary Economics. 115. 249–264. 17 indexed citations

Richter, Alexander W., et al.. (2019). The Zero Lower Bound and Estimation Accuracy. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas, Working Papers. 2018(1804). 6 indexed citations

Richter, Alexander W., et al.. (2018). The Accuracy of Linear and Nonlinear Estimation in the Presence of the Zero Lower Bound. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas, Working Papers. 2018(1804). 2 indexed citations

Richter, Alexander W., et al.. (2018). Uncertainty Shocks in a Model of Effective Demand: Comment. Econometrica. 86(4). 1513–1526. 15 indexed citations

Richter, Alexander W., et al.. (2017). A New Way to Quantify the Effect of Uncertainty. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas, Working Papers. 2017(1705). 3 indexed citations

10.

Richter, Alexander W. & Nathaniel A. Throckmorton. (2016). Is Rotemberg pricing justified by macro data?. Economics Letters. 149. 44–48. 18 indexed citations

11.

Richter, Alexander W., et al.. (2016). Are Nonlinear Methods Necessary at the Zero Lower Bound?. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas, Working Papers. 2016(1606). 6 indexed citations

12.

Keen, Benjamin D., Alexander W. Richter, & Nathaniel A. Throckmorton. (2016). Forward Guidance and the State of the Economy. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas, Working Papers. 2016(1612). 6 indexed citations

13.

Richter, Alexander W. & Nathaniel A. Throckmorton. (2015). The consequences of an unknown debt target. European Economic Review. 78. 76–96. 14 indexed citations

14.

Plante, Michael, et al.. (2014). The Zero Lower Bound and Endogenous Uncertainty. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas, Working Papers. 2014(1405). 1 indexed citations

15.

Plante, Michael, Alexander W. Richter, & Nathaniel A. Throckmorton. (2014). The Zero Lower Bound and Endogenous Uncertainty. SSRN Electronic Journal. 7 indexed citations

16.

Throckmorton, Nathaniel A., Benjamin D. Keen, Alexander W. Richter, & William T. Gavin. (2013). Global Dynamics at the Zero Lower Bound. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics. 5 indexed citations

17.

Gavin, William T., Benjamin D. Keen, Alexander W. Richter, & Nathaniel A. Throckmorton. (2013). Global Dynamics at the Zero Lower Bound. SSRN Electronic Journal. 1 indexed citations

18.

Richter, Alexander W. & Nathaniel A. Throckmorton. (2013). The Consequences of Uncertain Debt Targets. SSRN Electronic Journal. 2 indexed citations

19.

Richter, Alexander W., Nathaniel A. Throckmorton, & Todd B. Walker. (2012). Accuracy, Speed and Robustness of Policy Function Iteration. SSRN Electronic Journal. 5 indexed citations

20.

Kumhof, Michael, et al.. (2012). Income Inequality and Current Account Imbalances. SSRN Electronic Journal. 2012(8). 1–1. 66 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact