John Xu

1.9k citations
24 papers · 560 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

John Xu

22 papers receiving 544 citations

Peers

John Xu
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 406
  • Nephrology 56
  • Surgery 257
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 95
  • Molecular Biology 171
Replace Alessandra Scamporrino with:
Alessandra Scamporrino Italy
Norihisa Osawa Japan
Nobuko Maruyama Japan
Xuesi Wan China
Irina Kline United States
M. France United Kingdom
Christina Stahre Sweden
S. Durán‐García Spain
Lijun Ma China
John Xu relative to Alessandra Scamporrino Italy Alessandra Scamporrino's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.8×
Alessandra Scamporrino · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Xu

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Xu's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Xu with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Xu more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Xu

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Xu. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Xu. The network helps show where John Xu may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John Xu, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Xu Line = papers co-authored together John Xu links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2017115
2 202053
3 201640
4 201935
5 201735
6 201333
7 202033
8 201731
9 201629
10 201727
11 202026
12 202024
13 200523
14 201018
15 201810
16 20198
17 20077
18 20144
19 20173
20 20243

About John Xu

John Xu is a scholar working on Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Surgery, Molecular Biology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Oncology, having authored 24 papers that have together received 560 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Diabetes Treatment and Management (16 papers), Pancreatic function and diabetes (10 papers), Diabetes Management and Research (10 papers), Metabolism, Diabetes, and Cancer (7 papers), Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology (2 papers), Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies (2 papers), Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations (2 papers) and Asthma and respiratory diseases (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (406 citations), Nephrology (56 citations), Surgery (257 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (95 citations) and Molecular Biology (171 citations). John Xu has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Sweden and Germany. Frequent co-authors include C. David Sjöström, Paresh Dandona, Nevin Ajluni, Frederik Persson, Hiddo J.L. Heerspink, S. Petrykiv, Peter J. Greasley, Chantal Mathieu, Moshe Phillip and Fredrik Thorén. Their work appears in journals such as Diabetes Obesity and Metabolism, Diabetes, Investigational New Drugs, Clinical and Experimental Rheumatology and The Journal of Pediatrics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact