John Woolham

705 citations
40 papers · 370 indexed · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

John Woolham

37 papers receiving 354 citations

Peers

John Woolham
Comparison fields: 5 of 51
  • Demography 125
  • General Health Professions 214
  • Occupational Therapy 29
  • Education 197
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 62
Replace Errol Cocks with:
Errol Cocks Australia
Alexis Buettgen Canada
Sandra Minardi Mitre Brazil
Neusi Aparecida Navas Berbel Brazil
Christian Wendelborg Norway
Mo Ray United Kingdom
Erin Roark Murphy United States
Rosita Saupe Brazil
Dana Scott Gilmore United States
Thomas B. Jankowski United States
John Woolham relative to Errol Cocks Australia Errol Cocks's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.6×
Errol Cocks · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Woolham

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Woolham's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Woolham with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Woolham more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Woolham

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Woolham. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Woolham. The network helps show where John Woolham may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John Woolham, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Woolham Line = papers co-authored together John Woolham links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 40 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201638
2 201236
3 201329
4 202125
5
Building a Local Infrastructure that Supports the Use of Assistive Technology in the Care of People with Dementia
200222
6 201519
7
Assistive Technology, Telecare, and Dementia: Some Implications of Current Policies and Guidance
200617
8 201615
9 201613
10 201913
11 201913
12 201913
13 201612
14 201511
15 20227
16 20197
17 20226
18 20156
19 20156
20 20206

About John Woolham

John Woolham is a scholar working on Education, General Health Professions, Demography, Sociology and Political Science and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 40 papers that have together received 370 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Healthcare innovation and challenges (25 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (15 papers), Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving (11 papers), Social Policy and Reform Studies (8 papers), Elder Abuse and Neglect (8 papers), Migration, Aging, and Tourism Studies (4 papers), Employment and Welfare Studies (4 papers) and Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Demography (125 citations), General Health Professions (214 citations), Occupational Therapy (29 citations), Education (197 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (62 citations). John Woolham has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include Nicole Steils, Jill Manthorpe, C. Benton, Kritika Samsi, Caroline Norrie, Tim H. Sparks, Martin Stevens, Malcolm Fisk, Stanton Newman and Chris Fox. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Social Work, Health & Social Care in the Community, The Journal of Adult Protection, Ageing and Society and The British Journal of Social Work.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact