John Winder
Impact in
- Oral Surgery top 5%
- Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
- Dental Radiography and Imaging
- General Dentistry top 10%
Papers in
-
- Anatomy and Medical Technology 5
- Medical Imaging and Analysis 2
- Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging 1
- Surgery 2
- Surgical Simulation and Training 1
- Co-authors
- Richard Bibb (3 shared papers)Darren Thompson (1 shared paper)David G. Hirst (1 shared paper)Zhonghua Sun (1 shared paper)Peter K. Ellis (1 shared paper)Peter T. Kennedy (1 shared paper)Brian McClelland (2 shared papers)Nekane Larburu (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics (1 paper)Journal of Anatomy (1 paper)Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (1 paper)Radiography (1 paper)Medical Engineering & Physics (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomAustraliaJapan
In The Last Decade
John Winder
9 papers receiving 407 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
- Oral Surgery 65
- General Dentistry 13
- Orthodontics 29
- Automotive Engineering 86
- Biomedical Engineering 242
Countries citing papers authored by John Winder
This map shows the geographic impact of John Winder's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Winder with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Winder more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John Winder
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Winder. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Winder. The network helps show where John Winder may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 13 scholars most cited alongside John Winder, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2005 | 298 | |
| 2 | 2011 | 51 | |
| 3 | 2009 | 45 | |
| 4 | 2003 | 15 | |
| 5 | 2017 | 6 | |
| 6 | 2012 | 4 | |
| 7 | 2004 | 2 | |
| 8 | Discovering Skeletal Joe Median | 2006 | 1 |
| 9 | 2019 | 1 |
About John Winder
John Winder is a scholar working on Biomedical Engineering, Surgery, Molecular Biology, Automotive Engineering and Pharmacology, having authored 9 papers that have together received 423 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Anatomy and Medical Technology (5 papers), Medical Imaging and Analysis (2 papers), Surgical Simulation and Training (1 paper), Electronic Health Records Systems (1 paper), Clinical practice guidelines implementation (1 paper), Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging (1 paper), Aortic aneurysm repair treatments (1 paper) and Renal and Vascular Pathologies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Oral Surgery (65 citations), General Dentistry (13 citations), Orthodontics (29 citations), Automotive Engineering (86 citations) and Biomedical Engineering (242 citations). John Winder has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Richard Bibb, Darren Thompson, David G. Hirst, Zhonghua Sun, Peter K. Ellis, Peter T. Kennedy, Brian McClelland, Nekane Larburu, Hui Wang and Brigitte Séroussi. Their work appears in journals such as Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics, Journal of Anatomy, Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Radiography and Medical Engineering & Physics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.