John Williams

131 papers receiving 1.7k citations

Peers

John Williams
Comparison fields: 5 of 177
  • Business and International Management 105
  • Philosophy 327
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 185
  • Clinical Biochemistry 180
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 262
Replace Claus Rerup with:
Claus Rerup Sweden
Marina Bianchi Italy
Neil A. Holtzman United States
José Guimón Spain
Andrew Collier United Kingdom
Richard B. Brandt United States
Sharon Grant Australia
Maria Hägglund Sweden
David E. Mills United States
Peter O’Connor United Kingdom
John Williams relative to Claus Rerup Sweden Claus Rerup's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×21.8×
Claus Rerup · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Williams

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Williams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Williams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Williams more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Williams

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Williams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Williams. The network helps show where John Williams may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John Williams, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Williams Line = papers co-authored together John Williams links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 144 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2005229
2 195385
3 201277
4 195550
5 200846
6
Moore's Paradox: New Essays on Belief, Rationality, and the First Person
200746
7 199542
8 195641
9 199436
10 195133
11 195232
12 200432
13 195228
14 195528
15 200727
16 195127
17 195125
18 195224
19 200522
20 197921

About John Williams

John Williams is a scholar working on Philosophy, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Molecular Biology, Clinical Biochemistry and Physiology, having authored 144 papers that have together received 1.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (32 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (27 papers), Metabolism and Genetic Disorders (19 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (10 papers), Amino Acid Enzymes and Metabolism (9 papers), Folate and B Vitamins Research (9 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (8 papers) and Enzyme function and inhibition (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Business and International Management (105 citations), Philosophy (327 citations), Management of Technology and Innovation (185 citations), Clinical Biochemistry (180 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (262 citations). John Williams has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Singapore and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Wee Liang Tan, C.A. Elvehjem, Gerald Litwack, C. A. Elvehjem, Eric W. K. Tsang, James W. Bothwell, Mitchell S. Green, David D. Gilboe, P. G. Tulpule and Philip Feigelson. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Biological Chemistry, Experimental Biology and Medicine, Analysis, Journal of Nutrition and Journal of Dental Education.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact