John Wicks
Impact in
- Toxicology top 0.5%
- Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine top 10%
- Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects
Papers in
- Toxicology 12
- Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis 12
-
- Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects 10
- Co-authors
- Lolita Tsanaclis (14 shared papers)John F. Wilson (2 shared papers)Robert H. Kingston (1 shared paper)Leslie C. Moore (1 shared paper)Vina Spiehler (1 shared paper)Alan Richens (1 shared paper)Marie Davies (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Drug Testing and Analysis (4 papers)Therapeutic Drug Monitoring (3 papers)Forensic Science International (3 papers)Journal of Analytical Toxicology (2 papers)Annals of Clinical Biochemistry International Journal of Laboratory Medicine (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomBrazilSwitzerland
In The Last Decade
John Wicks
15 papers receiving 325 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
- Toxicology 229
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 95
- Clinical Psychology 70
- Pharmacology 50
- Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 48
Countries citing papers authored by John Wicks
This map shows the geographic impact of John Wicks's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Wicks with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Wicks more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John Wicks
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Wicks. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Wicks. The network helps show where John Wicks may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 7 scholars most cited alongside John Wicks, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2008 | 94 | |
| 2 | 2007 | 47 | |
| 3 | 2018 | 39 | |
| 4 | 1991 | 29 | |
| 5 | 2014 | 26 | |
| 6 | 2012 | 25 | |
| 7 | 1992 | 18 | |
| 8 | 2001 | 17 | |
| 9 | 2009 | 16 | |
| 10 | 1995 | 13 | |
| 11 | 2020 | 8 | |
| 12 | 2020 | 7 | |
| 13 | 1994 | 4 | |
| 14 | 2022 | 1 | |
| 15 | 2014 | 1 | |
| 16 | 2015 | 0 |
About John Wicks
John Wicks is a scholar working on Toxicology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Molecular Biology and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 16 papers that have together received 345 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis (12 papers), Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects (10 papers), Hormonal and reproductive studies (5 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (3 papers), Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies (3 papers), Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (3 papers), Analytical Methods in Pharmaceuticals (2 papers) and Pesticide Residue Analysis and Safety (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Toxicology (229 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (95 citations), Clinical Psychology (70 citations), Pharmacology (50 citations) and Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (48 citations). John Wicks has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Brazil and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Lolita Tsanaclis, John F. Wilson, Robert H. Kingston, Leslie C. Moore, Vina Spiehler, Alan Richens and Marie Davies. Their work appears in journals such as Drug Testing and Analysis, Therapeutic Drug Monitoring, Forensic Science International, Journal of Analytical Toxicology and Annals of Clinical Biochemistry International Journal of Laboratory Medicine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.