John W. McDavid
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 10%
- Clinical Psychology
- Developmental and Educational Psychology
- Topics
- Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (5 papers)Names, Identity, and Discrimination Research (3 papers)Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
John W. McDavid
22 papers receiving 430 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
- Sociology and Political Science 284
- Social Psychology 145
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 79
- Clinical Psychology 62
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 60
Countries citing papers authored by John W. McDavid
This map shows the geographic impact of John W. McDavid's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John W. McDavid with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John W. McDavid more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John W. McDavid
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John W. McDavid. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John W. McDavid. The network helps show where John W. McDavid may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of John W. McDavid
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John W. McDavid. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John W. McDavid based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John W. McDavid. John W. McDavid is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Understanding children: Promoting human growth | 3 |
| 2 | Psychology and Social Behaviour | 1 |
| 3 | Ethnic Factors in Stereotypes of Given Names. | 5 |
| 4 | Psychology and social behavior | 11 |
| 5 | Name stereotypes and teachers' expectations.breakdown → | 133 |
| 6 | 111 | |
| 7 | 37 | |
| 8 | 14 | |
| 9 | 62 | |
| 10 | 3 | |
| 11 | 0 | |
| 12 | 28 | |
| 13 | 16 | |
| 14 | 17 | |
| 15 | 6 | |
| 16 | 5 | |
| 17 | 12 | |
| 18 | 10 | |
| 19 | 21 | |
| 20 | 6 |
About John W. McDavid
John W. McDavid is a scholar working on General Psychology, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Clinical Psychology, having authored 23 papers that have together received 536 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (5 papers), Names, Identity, and Discrimination Research (3 papers) and Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (27 citations), Applied Psychology (55 citations) and General Psychology (12 citations). John W. McDavid has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Herbert Harari, Frank Sistrunk, Boyd R. McCandless, S. Gray Garwood and Harold M. Schroder. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, American Sociological Review and Child Development.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.