John W. Eadie

1.5k total citations
35 papers, 315 citations indexed

About

John W. Eadie is a scholar working on Archeology, Anthropology and History. According to data from OpenAlex, John W. Eadie has authored 35 papers receiving a total of 315 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 13 papers in Archeology, 11 papers in Anthropology and 10 papers in History. Recurrent topics in John W. Eadie's work include Classical Antiquity Studies (11 papers), Ancient and Medieval Archaeology Studies (6 papers) and Historical and Religious Studies of Rome (5 papers). John W. Eadie is often cited by papers focused on Classical Antiquity Studies (11 papers), Ancient and Medieval Archaeology Studies (6 papers) and Historical and Religious Studies of Rome (5 papers). John W. Eadie collaborates with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. John W. Eadie's co-authors include Alan Cameron, Christer Bruun, K. D. White, H. A. Drake, Sheppard Frere, Mortimer Chambers, Stephen Johnson, Thomas S. Burns, Chester G. Starr and André Chastagnol and has published in prestigious journals such as The American Historical Review, Journal of American History and The Classical World.

In The Last Decade

John W. Eadie

26 papers receiving 201 citations

Peers

John W. Eadie
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
  • Archeology 152
  • Anthropology 151
  • History 80
  • Classics 71
  • Sociology and Political Science 32
Replace Henry C. Boren with:
Henry C. Boren United States
Anthony R. Birley Germany
Joyce Reynolds United Kingdom
George W. Houston United States
Jerzy Linderski United States
J. H. W. G. Liebeschuetz United Kingdom
Werner Eck Germany
R. Ross Holloway United States
Géza Alföldy Germany
Emma Dench United Kingdom
Henry C. Boren United States View profile →
Citations per field, relative to John W. Eadie
John W. Eadie · 1×
Citations per year, relative to John W. Eadie
John W. Eadie · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by John W. Eadie

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John W. Eadie's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John W. Eadie with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John W. Eadie more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John W. Eadie

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John W. Eadie. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John W. Eadie. The network helps show where John W. Eadie may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of John W. Eadie

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John W. Eadie. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John W. Eadie based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John W. Eadie. John W. Eadie is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1
The imperial dictionary of universal biography
0
2
Urban centers and rural contexts in late antiquity
11
3
A Commentary on the Greek Text of the Epistle of Paul to the Ephesians
3
4 2
5 0
6 1
7 4
8 3
9 29
10 13
11 28
12 1
13 6
14 3
15 11
16 1
17
The Breviarium of Festus
6
18 1
19 2
20
Commentary on the Epistle of Paul to the Colossians
0

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026