Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
The Importance of Consumer Trust for the Emergence of a Market for Green Products: The Case of Organic Food
Countries citing papers authored by John Thøgersen
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of John Thøgersen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Thøgersen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Thøgersen more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Thøgersen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Thøgersen. The network helps show where John Thøgersen may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of John Thøgersen
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John Thøgersen.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John Thøgersen based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with John Thøgersen. John Thøgersen is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Ölander, Folke & John Thøgersen. (2014). Informing versus Nudging in Environmental Policy. SSRN Electronic Journal.1 indexed citations
9.
Schuitema, Geertje, et al.. (2014). Responsible Technology Acceptance: Model Development and Application to Consumer Acceptance of Smart Grid Technology. SSRN Electronic Journal.1 indexed citations
10.
Lanzini, Pietro & John Thøgersen. (2014). Behavioural Spillover in the Environmental Domain: An Intervention Study. SSRN Electronic Journal.
Thøgersen, John. (2012). The Importance of Timing for Breaking Commuters’ Car Driving Habits. Työväentutkimus Vuosikirja.27 indexed citations
13.
Thøgersen, John & Lone Bredahl. (2006). Cross-national and lifestyle differences in consumer choice criteria and motives with regard to a processed organic food. ACR Asia-Pacific Advances.4 indexed citations
14.
Ölander, Folke & John Thøgersen. (2005). The A-B-C of Recycling. ACR European Advances.21 indexed citations
15.
Poulsen, Carsten Stig, Joachim Scholderer, Karen Brunsø, Klaus G. Grunert, & John Thøgersen. (2004). On chickens and eggs and organic foods: What constitutes a consumer trend?. Food Quality and Preference.2 indexed citations
Thøgersen, John. (2001). Special Session Summary Consumer Values, Behavior and Sustainable Development. ACR Asia-Pacific Advances.8 indexed citations
19.
Thøgersen, John. (1998). Understanding Behaviours With Mixed Motives. an Application of a Modified Theory of Reasoned Action on Consumer Purchase of Organic Food Products. ACR European Advances.8 indexed citations
20.
Thøgersen, John, et al.. (1997). Values and Attitude Formation Towards Emerging Attitude Objects: From Recycling to General, Waste Minimizing Behavior. CBS Research Portal (Copenhagen Business School). 24. 182–189.96 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.