John T. Waterman
- Language and Linguistics top 1%
- Artificial Intelligence top 10%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 10%
- General Health Professions
- Sociology and Political Science
- Co-authors
- Eugene A. NidaMario A. PeiHerbert PenzlGottfried Wilhelm LeibnizTullio De MauroRaffaele SimoneBarbara M. H. Strang
- Topics
- Historical Linguistics and Language Studies (10 papers)Linguistics and language evolution (4 papers)Spanish Linguistics and Language Studies (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
John T. Waterman
17 papers receiving 346 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 50
- Language and Linguistics 348
- Artificial Intelligence 93
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 80
- General Health Professions 46
- Sociology and Political Science 46
Countries citing papers authored by John T. Waterman
This map shows the geographic impact of John T. Waterman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John T. Waterman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John T. Waterman more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John T. Waterman
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John T. Waterman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John T. Waterman. The network helps show where John T. Waterman may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of John T. Waterman
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John T. Waterman. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John T. Waterman based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John T. Waterman. John T. Waterman is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | Leibniz and Ludolf on things linguistic: Excerpts from their correspondence, 1688-1703 | 5 |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 4 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | Breve storia della linguistica | 3 |
| 8 | 15 | |
| 9 | 8 | |
| 10 | Toward a Science of Translating: With Special Reference to Principles and Procedures Involved in Bible Translatingbreakdown → | 398 |
| 11 | 0 | |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | 12 | |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | 3 | |
| 16 | 7 | |
| 17 | 1 | |
| 18 | 0 | |
| 19 | 4 | |
| 20 | 0 |
About John T. Waterman
John T. Waterman is a scholar working on Language and Linguistics, Linguistics and Language and Anthropology, having authored 22 papers that have together received 469 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Historical Linguistics and Language Studies (10 papers), Linguistics and language evolution (4 papers) and Spanish Linguistics and Language Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Language and Linguistics (348 citations), Linguistics and Language (38 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (80 citations). John T. Waterman has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Eugene A. Nida, Mario A. Pei, Herbert Penzl, Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz, Tullio De Mauro, Raffaele Simone and Barbara M. H. Strang. Their work appears in journals such as Language, Modern Language Journal and The Modern Language Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.