John T. Singleton

849 total citations · 1 hit paper
7 papers, 718 citations indexed

About

John T. Singleton is a scholar working on Organic Chemistry, Molecular Biology and Pharmaceutical Science. According to data from OpenAlex, John T. Singleton has authored 7 papers receiving a total of 718 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Organic Chemistry, 2 papers in Molecular Biology and 1 paper in Pharmaceutical Science. Recurrent topics in John T. Singleton's work include Synthetic Organic Chemistry Methods (4 papers), Chemical Synthesis and Analysis (2 papers) and Catalytic Cross-Coupling Reactions (2 papers). John T. Singleton is often cited by papers focused on Synthetic Organic Chemistry Methods (4 papers), Chemical Synthesis and Analysis (2 papers) and Catalytic Cross-Coupling Reactions (2 papers). John T. Singleton collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Brazil and Japan. John T. Singleton's co-authors include Eric Merifield, Alison C. Foster, Marie‐Lyne Alcaraz, D. Michael Gill, Robert Nixon, T. MATSUMOTO, Kevin R. Anderson and Gareth J. Rowlands and has published in prestigious journals such as Tetrahedron, Organic Process Research & Development and Journal of Heterocyclic Chemistry.

In The Last Decade

John T. Singleton

6 papers receiving 709 citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

The uses of pincer complexes in organic synthesis

2003 563 citations John T. Singleton Tetrahedron profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
John T. Singleton United Kingdom	5	655	272	71	59	54	7	718
Shihui Teo Singapore	11	576 0.9×	250 0.9×	85 1.2×	75 1.3×	40 0.7×	14	632
J.T. Ciszewski United States	10	542 0.8×	262 1.0×	47 0.7×	47 0.8×	48 0.9×	16	623
Roger W. Quan United States	7	700 1.1×	379 1.4×	112 1.6×	38 0.6×	66 1.2×	8	830
Daniel A. Lev United States	9	487 0.7×	238 0.9×	58 0.8×	30 0.5×	34 0.6×	10	548
Yong‐Shou Lin Japan	17	612 0.9×	255 0.9×	136 1.9×	53 0.9×	58 1.1×	29	687
Claudia M. Fafard United States	11	445 0.7×	312 1.1×	41 0.6×	71 1.2×	59 1.1×	12	523
Paulo Dani Netherlands	14	687 1.0×	470 1.7×	96 1.4×	74 1.3×	62 1.1×	18	791
Silvia Bordoni Italy	13	369 0.6×	180 0.7×	62 0.9×	58 1.0×	51 0.9×	37	452
A. Dervisi United Kingdom	18	928 1.4×	321 1.2×	69 1.0×	125 2.1×	37 0.7×	25	999
V. Gomez-Benitez Mexico	13	668 1.0×	282 1.0×	81 1.1×	51 0.9×	40 0.7×	22	732

Countries citing papers authored by John T. Singleton

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John T. Singleton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John T. Singleton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John T. Singleton more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John T. Singleton

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John T. Singleton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John T. Singleton. The network helps show where John T. Singleton may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of John T. Singleton

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John T. Singleton. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John T. Singleton based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John T. Singleton. John T. Singleton is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

7 of 7 papers shown

1.

Anderson, Kevin R., et al.. (2009). Routes for the Synthesis of (2S)-2-Methyltetrahydropyran-4-one from Simple Optically Pure Building Blocks. Organic Process Research & Development. 14(1). 58–71. 21 indexed citations

2.

Merifield, Eric, et al.. (2009). A Convergent Synthesis of AR-C123196 Utilising Reaction Between a Cyclic Carbonate and a Phenol for Aryl Alkyl Ether Formation. Organic Process Research & Development. 13(4). 751–759. 16 indexed citations

3.

Foster, Alison C., et al.. (2008). A general and efficient route to 6‐methyl‐pyrazin‐2‐yl‐amines: Alkylation of 2,6‐dichloropyrazine via malonate derivatives. Journal of Heterocyclic Chemistry. 45(5). 1451–1456. 5 indexed citations

4.

Alcaraz, Marie‐Lyne, Alison C. Foster, D. Michael Gill, et al.. (2005). Efficient Syntheses of AZD4407 via Thioether Formation by Nucleophilic Attack of Organometallic Species on Sulphur. Organic Process Research & Development. 9(5). 555–569. 112 indexed citations

5.

Rowlands, Gareth J. & John T. Singleton. (2004). Activation by allylic alcohols of sulfur-containing dienes to ruthenium-catalysed ring-closing metathesis. Journal of Chemical Research. 2004(4). 247–251. 1 indexed citations

6.

Singleton, John T.. (2003). The Uses of Pincer Complexes in Organic Synthesis. ChemInform. 34(24).

7.

Singleton, John T.. (2003). The uses of pincer complexes in organic synthesis. Tetrahedron. 59(11). 1837–1857. 563 indexed citations breakdown →

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact