John T. King

1.8k citations
40 papers · 1.4k · h-index 20

Impact in

Papers in

John T. King

40 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

John T. King
Comparison fields: 5 of 119
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 200
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 614
  • Spectroscopy 264
  • Biophysics 90
  • Electrochemistry 66
Replace George W. H. Wurpel with:
George W. H. Wurpel Netherlands
Aurélien de la Lande France
Lars‐Olof Pålsson United Kingdom
Julia R. Widom United States
Valeria D. Kleiman United States
Alessandro Moretto Italy
Jan Karolin United Kingdom
E. W. Knapp Germany
Christopher M. Cheatum United States
Tomáš Kubař Germany
John T. King relative to George W. H. Wurpel Netherlands George W. H. Wurpel's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.8×
George W. H. Wurpel · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John T. King

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John T. King's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John T. King with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John T. King more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John T. King

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John T. King. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John T. King. The network helps show where John T. King may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John T. King, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John T. King Line = papers co-authored together John T. King links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 40 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2012153
2 2010134
3 2013122
4 2019110
5 201884
6 201575
7 201269
8 201067
9 201265
10 202155
11 201151
12 200646
13 201144
14 201534
15 201433
16 202032
17 201824
18 201223
19 201020
20 201419

About John T. King

John T. King is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Biophysics, Materials Chemistry and Spectroscopy, having authored 40 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies (15 papers), Protein Structure and Dynamics (8 papers), Advanced Fluorescence Microscopy Techniques (6 papers), RNA Research and Splicing (6 papers), Photosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms (4 papers), Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (3 papers), Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (3 papers) and Photoreceptor and optogenetics research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (200 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (614 citations), Spectroscopy (264 citations), Biophysics (90 citations) and Electrochemistry (66 citations). John T. King has collaborated with scholars based in United States, South Korea and Philippines. Frequent co-authors include Kevin J. Kubarych, Anisha Shakya, Charles L. Brooks, Evan J. Arthur, Zhan Chen, Khoi Tan Nguyen, Laura M. Kiefer, Matthew R. Ross, Jessica M. Anna and Carlos R. Baiz. Their work appears in journals such as Biophysical Journal, The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, Journal of the American Chemical Society, ACS Nano and The Journal of Physical Chemistry A.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact