John S. Scott‐Craig
- Plant Science top 2%
- Molecular Biology top 10%
- Biomedical Engineering top 5%
- Biotechnology top 1%
- Cell Biology top 5%
- Co-authors
- Jonathan D. WaltonGoutami BanerjeeDaniel G. PanaccioneSuzana CarNyerhovwo J. TonukariMelissa S. BorruschHeather E. Hallen‐AdamsHong Luo
- Topics
- Biofuel production and bioconversion (11 papers)Polysaccharides and Plant Cell Walls (6 papers)Fungal Biology and Applications (6 papers)
- Journals
- Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesJournal of Biological ChemistryThe Plant Cell
- Partner nations
- United StatesItalyAustralia
In The Last Decade
John S. Scott‐Craig
26 papers receiving 2.2k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
- Plant Science 1.2k
- Molecular Biology 1.2k
- Biomedical Engineering 840
- Biotechnology 385
- Cell Biology 379
Countries citing papers authored by John S. Scott‐Craig
This map shows the geographic impact of John S. Scott‐Craig's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John S. Scott‐Craig with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John S. Scott‐Craig more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John S. Scott‐Craig
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John S. Scott‐Craig. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John S. Scott‐Craig. The network helps show where John S. Scott‐Craig may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of John S. Scott‐Craig
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John S. Scott‐Craig. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John S. Scott‐Craig based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John S. Scott‐Craig. John S. Scott‐Craig is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 69 | |
| 2 | 26 | |
| 3 | 23 | |
| 4 | 48 | |
| 5 | 156 | |
| 6 | 92 | |
| 7 | 93 | |
| 8 | 129 | |
| 9 | 30 | |
| 10 | 171 | |
| 11 | 18 | |
| 12 | 145 | |
| 13 | 28 | |
| 14 | 68 | |
| 15 | 33 | |
| 16 | 55 | |
| 17 | 79 | |
| 18 | 118 | |
| 19 | 14 | |
| 20 | 184 |
About John S. Scott‐Craig
John S. Scott‐Craig is a scholar working on Biotechnology, Plant Science and Pharmacology, having authored 26 papers that have together received 2.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Biofuel production and bioconversion (11 papers), Polysaccharides and Plant Cell Walls (6 papers) and Fungal Biology and Applications (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biotechnology (385 citations), Plant Science (1.2k citations) and Cell Biology (379 citations). John S. Scott‐Craig has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Italy and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Jonathan D. Walton, Goutami Banerjee, Daniel G. Panaccione, Suzana Car, Nyerhovwo J. Tonukari, Melissa S. Borrusch, Heather E. Hallen‐Adams, Hong Luo, Jean‐Alain Pocard and Samuel P. Hazen. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Journal of Biological Chemistry and The Plant Cell.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.