John S. Schwartz
- Ecology top 5%
- Water Science and Technology top 2%
- Nature and Landscape Conservation top 5%
- Soil Science top 5%
- Global and Planetary Change top 10%
- Co-authors
- Edwin E. HerricksMatt A. KulpBenjamin SteinerBruce L. RhoadsR. Bruce RobinsonJon M. HathawayDaniel C. YoderStephen E. Moore
- Topics
- Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies (37 papers)Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes (37 papers)Fish Ecology and Management Studies (19 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesBangladeshCanada
In The Last Decade
John S. Schwartz
78 papers receiving 1.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 97
- Ecology 562
- Water Science and Technology 472
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 333
- Soil Science 251
- Global and Planetary Change 227
Countries citing papers authored by John S. Schwartz
This map shows the geographic impact of John S. Schwartz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John S. Schwartz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John S. Schwartz more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John S. Schwartz
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John S. Schwartz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John S. Schwartz. The network helps show where John S. Schwartz may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of John S. Schwartz
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John S. Schwartz. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John S. Schwartz based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John S. Schwartz. John S. Schwartz is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 5 | |
| 6 | 4 | |
| 7 | 5 | |
| 8 | 13 | |
| 9 | 16 | |
| 10 | 34 | |
| 11 | Water Quality Monitoring Program in Great Smoky Mountains National Park: Statistical reassessment of spatial and temporal design considerations. | 1 |
| 12 | 65 | |
| 13 | 45 | |
| 14 | 7 | |
| 15 | 14 | |
| 16 | 19 | |
| 17 | 18 | |
| 18 | 35 | |
| 19 | 2 | |
| 20 | 31 |
About John S. Schwartz
John S. Schwartz is a scholar working on Water Science and Technology, Environmental Chemistry and Soil Science, having authored 83 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies (37 papers), Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes (37 papers) and Fish Ecology and Management Studies (19 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Water Science and Technology (472 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (333 citations) and Soil Science (251 citations). John S. Schwartz has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Bangladesh and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Edwin E. Herricks, Matt A. Kulp, Benjamin Steiner, Bruce L. Rhoads, R. Bruce Robinson, Jon M. Hathaway, Daniel C. Yoder, Stephen E. Moore, Meijun Cai and Edmund Perfect. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, The Science of The Total Environment and Water Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.