John Rooksby

2.2k total citations · 1 hit paper
52 papers, 1.3k citations indexed

About

John Rooksby is a scholar working on Human-Computer Interaction, Sociology and Political Science and Information Systems. According to data from OpenAlex, John Rooksby has authored 52 papers receiving a total of 1.3k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 22 papers in Human-Computer Interaction, 16 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 11 papers in Information Systems. Recurrent topics in John Rooksby's work include Innovative Human-Technology Interaction (16 papers), Usability and User Interface Design (9 papers) and Information Systems Theories and Implementation (7 papers). John Rooksby is often cited by papers focused on Innovative Human-Technology Interaction (16 papers), Usability and User Interface Design (9 papers) and Information Systems Theories and Implementation (7 papers). John Rooksby collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and France. John Rooksby's co-authors include Alistair Morrison, Matthew Chalmers, Mattias Rost, Ian Sommerville, Mark Rouncefield, Cindy M. Gray, Marta E. Cecchinato, Dave Murray-Rust, David Martín and Andrew F Smith and has published in prestigious journals such as European Journal of Operational Research, Journal of Medical Internet Research and Anaesthesia.

In The Last Decade

John Rooksby

47 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

Personal tracking as lived informatics

2014 456 citations John Rooksby, Mattias Rost et al. ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) profile →

Peers

John Rooksby

HI

SPS

AP

GHP

IS

Erika Shehan Poole United States

Mattias Rost Sweden

Kay Connelly United States

Frank Bentley United States

Tad Hirsch United States

Kelly Caine United States

Silvia Gabrielli Italy

Ian Li United States

Amon Rapp Italy

Anja Thieme United Kingdom

Erika Shehan Poole United States

John Rooksby

740 ×1.3

HI

469 ×1.5

SPS

164 ×0.7

AP

338 ×1.5

GHP

225 ×1.1

IS

Citations per year, relative to John Rooksby John Rooksby (= 1×) peers Erika Shehan Poole

Countries citing papers authored by John Rooksby

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Rooksby's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Rooksby with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Rooksby more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Rooksby

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Rooksby. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Rooksby. The network helps show where John Rooksby may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of John Rooksby

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John Rooksby. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John Rooksby based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John Rooksby. John Rooksby is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

1.

Rose, Louise, Sian Saha, Chee Siang Ang, et al.. (2025). Family Caregiver Perspectives on Digital Methods to Measure Stress: Qualitative Descriptive Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 27. e66034–e66034.

2.

Wang, Zixin, Maria Alfredsson, Chee Siang Ang, et al.. (2025). Evaluation of Carbon-Based Interconnects for Digital Signaling in Printed Flexible Electronics on Sustainable Substrates. Research Portal (King's College London). 4(5). 209–217.

3.

Cecchinato, Marta E., et al.. (2023). Understanding Platform Mediated Work-Life: A Diary Study with Gig Economy Freelancers. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction. 7(CSCW1). 1–32. 20 indexed citations

4.

Rooksby, John, et al.. (2018). Evaluating the Impact of Physical Activity Apps and Wearables: Interdisciplinary Review. JMIR mhealth and uhealth. 6(3). e58–e58. 81 indexed citations

5.

Glind, Irene van de, Christopher Bunn, Cindy M. Gray, et al.. (2017). The intervention process in the European Fans in Training (EuroFIT) trial: a mixed method protocol for evaluation. Trials. 18(1). 356–356. 23 indexed citations

6.

Rooksby, John, et al.. (2016). Personal Tracking of Screen Time on Digital Devices. ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam). 284–296. 44 indexed citations

7.

Rooksby, John, et al.. (2016). Investigating how users engage with a pedometer app. ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam). 612–617. 4 indexed citations

8.

Rost, Mattias, et al.. (2015). FITtogether: an 'average' activity tracker. ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam). 2 indexed citations

9.

Rooksby, John, et al.. (2014). Practices of parallel media: using mobile devices when watching television. ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam). 8 indexed citations

10.

Baxter, Gordon, John Rooksby, Yuanzhi Wang, & Ali Khajeh‐Hosseini. (2012). The ironies of automation. 65–71. 39 indexed citations

11.

Rooksby, John & Ian Sommerville. (2011). The Management and Use of Social Network Sites in a Government Department. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW). 21(4-5). 397–415. 15 indexed citations

12.

Martín, David, John Rooksby, Mark Rouncefield, & Ian Sommerville. (2008). Cooperative work in software testing. 93–96. 2 indexed citations

13.

Sharma, Sudesh Raj, et al.. (2006). Involving users in the design of a system for sharing lessons from adverse incidents in anaesthesia. Anaesthesia. 61(4). 350–354. 16 indexed citations

14.

Rooksby, John, et al.. (2006). Incident reporting schemes and the need for a good story. International Journal of Medical Informatics. 76. S205–S211. 22 indexed citations

15.

Clarke, Karen, John Rooksby, Mark Rouncefield, Rob Procter, & Roger Slack. (2006). Healthcare information giving services: technologies and everyday practicalities. Health Informatics Journal. 12(2). 153–164. 5 indexed citations

16.

Martin, David & John Rooksby. (2006). Knowledge and Reasoning about Code in a Large Code Base. Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University). 6 indexed citations

17.

Kelly, Simon, Marian Iszatt‐White, John Rooksby, & Mark Rouncefield. (2005). Storytelling and Design: the problem of leadership. Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University). 1 indexed citations

18.

Rooksby, John, et al.. (2003). Managing Stakeholder Requirements in High Performance Computing Procurement. Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University).

19.

Rooksby, John & Stephen Kay. (2001). Clinical narrative and clinical organisation: properties of radiology reports.. PubMed. 84(Pt 1). 680–4. 3 indexed citations

20.

Rooksby, John & Stephen Kay. (2000). The communicative function of clinical narrative in radiology reporting.. PubMed. 77. 1045–50. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact