John R. Malpass
- Organic Chemistry top 2%
- Molecular Biology
- Spectroscopy top 10%
- Inorganic Chemistry
- Physical and Theoretical Chemistry top 10%
- Co-authors
- Robert S. AtkinsonHarold F. O’NeilDennis HocevarJohn DaviesLeo A. PaquetteCraig R. SmithMatthew P. WalkerRichard White
- Topics
- Chemical Reactions and Mechanisms (13 papers)Asymmetric Synthesis and Catalysis (12 papers)Chemical Reaction Mechanisms (11 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of the American Chemical SocietyJournal of Medicinal ChemistryThe Journal of Organic Chemistry
- Partner nations
- United KingdomAustraliaUnited States
In The Last Decade
John R. Malpass
76 papers receiving 915 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
- Organic Chemistry 761
- Molecular Biology 295
- Spectroscopy 92
- Inorganic Chemistry 75
- Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 72
Countries citing papers authored by John R. Malpass
This map shows the geographic impact of John R. Malpass's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John R. Malpass with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John R. Malpass more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John R. Malpass
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John R. Malpass. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John R. Malpass. The network helps show where John R. Malpass may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of John R. Malpass
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John R. Malpass. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John R. Malpass based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John R. Malpass. John R. Malpass is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 16 | |
| 2 | 13 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 35 | |
| 5 | 12 | |
| 6 | 13 | |
| 7 | 103 | |
| 8 | 15 | |
| 9 | 17 | |
| 10 | 13 | |
| 11 | 14 | |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | 16 | |
| 14 | 11 | |
| 15 | 4 | |
| 16 | 1 | |
| 17 | 2 | |
| 18 | 3 | |
| 19 | 4 | |
| 20 | 6 |
About John R. Malpass
John R. Malpass is a scholar working on Organic Chemistry, Physical and Theoretical Chemistry and Pharmaceutical Science, having authored 78 papers that have together received 985 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Chemical Reactions and Mechanisms (13 papers), Asymmetric Synthesis and Catalysis (12 papers) and Chemical Reaction Mechanisms (11 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Organic Chemistry (761 citations), Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (72 citations) and Pharmacology (59 citations). John R. Malpass has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Robert S. Atkinson, Harold F. O’Neil, Dennis Hocevar, John Davies, Leo A. Paquette, Craig R. Smith, Matthew P. Walker, Richard White, Sandeep Handa and Thomas J. Barton. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Chemical Society, Journal of Medicinal Chemistry and The Journal of Organic Chemistry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.