John R. Dean
Impact in
- Analytical Chemistry top 0.1%
- Analytical chemistry methods development
- Pollution top 0.5%
- Heavy metals in environment
Papers in
-
- Analytical chemistry methods development 51
-
- Heavy Metal Exposure and Toxicity 20
- Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact 18
- Co-authors
- Jane EntwistleIan J. BarnabasSusan P. OwenJohn D. PerryStephen P. StanforthIan A. FowlisLes EbdonR. C. Massey
- Journals
- The Analyst (16 papers)Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry (16 papers)Journal of Chromatography A (16 papers)Analytica Chimica Acta (15 papers)TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry (6 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesChina
In The Last Decade
John R. Dean
182 papers receiving 5.3k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 183
- Analytical Chemistry 1.6k
- Pollution 1.7k
- Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 1.8k
- Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 374
- Spectroscopy 1.1k
Countries citing papers authored by John R. Dean
This map shows the geographic impact of John R. Dean's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John R. Dean with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John R. Dean more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John R. Dean
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John R. Dean. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John R. Dean. The network helps show where John R. Dean may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside John R. Dean, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2024 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 4 | 2023 | 6 | |
| 5 | 2023 | 5 | |
| 6 | 2023 | 4 | |
| 7 | 2023 | 7 | |
| 8 | 2022 | 1 | |
| 9 | 2022 | 3 | |
| 10 | 2021 | 7 | |
| 11 | 2021 | 3 | |
| 12 | 2021 | 3 | |
| 13 | 2020 | 83 | |
| 14 | 2020 | 3 | |
| 15 | 2020 | 5 | |
| 16 | 2020 | 4 | |
| 17 | 2019 | 30 | |
| 18 | 2018 | 8 | |
| 19 | 2018 | 15 | |
| 20 | Development of an in-situ pressurised fluid extraction method for the extraction of PAHs prior to GC-MS analysis | 2008 | 2 |
About John R. Dean
John R. Dean is a scholar working on Analytical Chemistry, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Pollution, Spectroscopy and Radiological and Ultrasound Technology, having authored 189 papers that have together received 5.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Analytical chemistry methods development (51 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (38 papers), Heavy metals in environment (28 papers), Heavy Metal Exposure and Toxicity (20 papers), Phase Equilibria and Thermodynamics (19 papers), Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact (18 papers), Radioactivity and Radon Measurements (14 papers) and Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (13 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Analytical Chemistry (1.6k citations), Pollution (1.7k citations), Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (1.8k citations), Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (374 citations) and Spectroscopy (1.1k citations). John R. Dean has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and China. Frequent co-authors include Jane Entwistle, Ian J. Barnabas, Susan P. Owen, John D. Perry, Stephen P. Stanforth, Ian A. Fowlis, Les Ebdon, R. C. Massey, Louise M. Garden and Guohua Xiong. Their work appears in journals such as The Analyst, Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry, Journal of Chromatography A, Analytica Chimica Acta and TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.