John R. Cole
- Plant Science top 5%
- Parasitology top 0.5%
- Infectious Diseases top 5%
- Cell Biology top 5%
- Small Animals top 2%
- Co-authors
- Alfred R. PursellCatherine R. SulzerLenn R. HarrisonLouis E. NewmanD.F. GibsonK.A. JohnsonSimon A. ColeFrançois Elvinger
- Topics
- Animal Virus Infections Studies (5 papers)Viral Infections and Vectors (4 papers)Microbial infections and disease research (4 papers)
- Journals
- NatureScienceThe Lancet
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomIndia
In The Last Decade
John R. Cole
57 papers receiving 1.7k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 135
- Plant Science 696
- Parasitology 631
- Infectious Diseases 367
- Cell Biology 363
- Small Animals 231
Countries citing papers authored by John R. Cole
This map shows the geographic impact of John R. Cole's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John R. Cole with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John R. Cole more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John R. Cole
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John R. Cole. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John R. Cole. The network helps show where John R. Cole may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of John R. Cole
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John R. Cole. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John R. Cole based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John R. Cole. John R. Cole is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 30 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 7 | |
| 5 | As It Seemed to Me : Political Memoirs | 3 |
| 6 | 28 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 13 | |
| 9 | Rehabilitation of the severely brain-injured patient: a community-based, low-cost model program. | 19 |
| 10 | 4 | |
| 11 | 14 | |
| 12 | Misquoted Scientists Respond. | 1 |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | Serologic and incidence of eperythrozoonosis in Georgia swine. | 0 |
| 15 | 8 | |
| 16 | 1 | |
| 17 | Cimon’s Dismissal, Ephialtes’ Revolution, and the Peloponnesian Wars | 2 |
| 18 | 11 | |
| 19 | 1 | |
| 20 | 3 |
About John R. Cole
John R. Cole is a scholar working on Small Animals, Parasitology and Animal Science and Zoology, having authored 63 papers that have together received 1.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Animal Virus Infections Studies (5 papers), Viral Infections and Vectors (4 papers) and Microbial infections and disease research (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Parasitology (631 citations), Small Animals (231 citations) and Cell Biology (363 citations). John R. Cole has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and India. Frequent co-authors include Alfred R. Pursell, Catherine R. Sulzer, Lenn R. Harrison, Louis E. Newman, D.F. Gibson, K.A. Johnson, Simon A. Cole, François Elvinger, Charles A. Baldwin and William F. Gee. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, Science and The Lancet.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.