John Pilling

2.7k total citations
81 papers, 1.6k citations indexed

About

John Pilling is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Philosophy and Mechanical Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, John Pilling has authored 81 papers receiving a total of 1.6k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 41 papers in Literature and Literary Theory, 36 papers in Philosophy and 17 papers in Mechanical Engineering. Recurrent topics in John Pilling's work include Samuel Beckett and Modernism (40 papers), Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism (32 papers) and Kierkegaardian Philosophy and Influence (20 papers). John Pilling is often cited by papers focused on Samuel Beckett and Modernism (40 papers), Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism (32 papers) and Kierkegaardian Philosophy and Influence (20 papers). John Pilling collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. John Pilling's co-authors include N. Ridley, A. Hellawell, J.B. Hawkyard, D. W. Livesey, James Knowlson, Martha Fehsenfeld, Samuel Beckett, Muhammad Islam, Robin W. Grimes and Mark Pitkin and has published in prestigious journals such as Materials Science and Engineering A, Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry and Journal of Materials Science.

In The Last Decade

John Pilling

61 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

John Pilling
Comparison fields: 5 of 101
  • Mechanical Engineering 924
  • Materials Chemistry 693
  • Aerospace Engineering 351
  • Mechanics of Materials 314
  • Literature and Literary Theory 285
Replace J. C. Conway with:
J. C. Conway United States
Héctor Torres Cuevas Austria
William Kurz United States
Yoshikazu NAKAI Japan
Gang Wang China
P.K. De India
M. Aksoy Türkiye
Alain Guillet France
A. Yu. Churyumov Russia
Wenjing Wang China
J. C. Conway United States View profile →
Citations per field, relative to John Pilling
John Pilling · 1×
Citations per year, relative to John Pilling
John Pilling · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by John Pilling

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Pilling's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Pilling with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Pilling more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Pilling

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Pilling. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Pilling. The network helps show where John Pilling may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of John Pilling

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John Pilling. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John Pilling based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John Pilling. John Pilling is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 1
2 18
3 2
4 0
5 1
6
19
7
ASSESSMENT OF REPRODUCIBILITY AND ACCURACY IN TEMPLATING HYBRID TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY USING DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHS
11
8 23
9 45
10 2
11 18
12 3
13 145
14 4
15 17
16 1
17 50
18 0
19 109
20 0

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026