John P. Kelly
- Ophthalmology top 2%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Aerospace Engineering top 5%
- Molecular Biology
- Epidemiology
- Co-authors
- Avery H. WeissThomas L. AinsworthJames O. PhillipsJong-Sen LeeCarlos López-MartínezEric J. SeibelThomas A. FurnessKaren Manning
- Topics
- Visual perception and processing mechanisms (19 papers)Retinal Development and Disorders (15 papers)Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (12 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesSpainTaiwan
In The Last Decade
John P. Kelly
68 papers receiving 1.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 110
- Ophthalmology 302
- Cognitive Neuroscience 255
- Aerospace Engineering 214
- Molecular Biology 189
- Epidemiology 163
Countries citing papers authored by John P. Kelly
This map shows the geographic impact of John P. Kelly's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John P. Kelly with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John P. Kelly more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John P. Kelly
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John P. Kelly. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John P. Kelly. The network helps show where John P. Kelly may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of John P. Kelly
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John P. Kelly. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John P. Kelly based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John P. Kelly. John P. Kelly is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 4 | |
| 3 | Measurement of Retinal Vessel Width in Tele-ophthalmology for Mobile Health Monitoring | 1 |
| 4 | 5 | |
| 5 | 11 | |
| 6 | 7 | |
| 7 | 13 | |
| 8 | 30 | |
| 9 | 29 | |
| 10 | 48 | |
| 11 | Polarimetric Analysis of Dual Polarimetric SAR Imagery | 10 |
| 12 | Statistical evaluation and bias removal of multi-look effect on Entropy/ alpha/Anisotropy in polarimetric target decomposition | 6 |
| 13 | 38 | |
| 14 | 19 | |
| 15 | The virtual retinal display as a low-vision computer interface: a pilot study. | 15 |
| 16 | 23 | |
| 17 | 6 | |
| 18 | 1 | |
| 19 | 20 | |
| 20 | 54 |
About John P. Kelly
John P. Kelly is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Neurology and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 70 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Visual perception and processing mechanisms (19 papers), Retinal Development and Disorders (15 papers) and Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (12 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (302 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (255 citations) and Media Technology (110 citations). John P. Kelly has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Spain and Taiwan. Frequent co-authors include Avery H. Weiss, Thomas L. Ainsworth, James O. Phillips, Jong-Sen Lee, Carlos López-Martínez, Eric J. Seibel, Thomas A. Furness, Karen Manning, Robert K. Moore and Davida Y. Teller. Their work appears in journals such as IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, Ophthalmology and The Journal of Pediatrics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.