John Nee

1.8k citations
22 papers · 1.3k indexed · h-index 14

John Nee

21 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

John Nee
Comparison fields: 5 of 142
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 361
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 84
  • Clinical Psychology 359
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 113
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 380
Replace Katja Ocepek‐Welikson with:
Katja Ocepek‐Welikson United States
G. Frank Lawlis United States
Herbert Fliege Germany
Donald R. Hedeker United States
José Antonio López Pina Spain
Paul Waraich Canada
Kristin N. Javaras United States
Gwendolyn E. P. Zahner United States
Bruce G. Charlton United Kingdom
Stephen Tyrer United Kingdom
John Nee relative to Katja Ocepek‐Welikson United States Katja Ocepek‐Welikson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.9×
Katja Ocepek‐Welikson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Nee

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Nee's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Nee with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Nee more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Nee

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Nee. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Nee. The network helps show where John Nee may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 24 scholars most cited alongside John Nee, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Nee Line = papers co-authored together John Nee links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20116
2 200773
3 2006109
4 19991
5 199337
6 198979
7 198970
8 19879
9 198770
10 19874
11 19878
12 198623
13 1986115
14 1985181
15 198421
16 1981125
17 197916
18 1979330
19 197851
20 19767

About John Nee

John Nee is a scholar working on Statistics and Probability, Family Practice, Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, Psychiatry and Mental health and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 22 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Menstrual Health and Disorders (5 papers), Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (4 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (4 papers), Advanced Statistical Methods and Models (3 papers), Biochemical effects in animals (3 papers), Reliability and Agreement in Measurement (3 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (3 papers) and Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (361 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (84 citations), Clinical Psychology (359 citations), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (113 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (380 citations). John Nee has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Japan and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Jean Endicott, J. Richard Landis, Joseph L. Fleiss, Uriel Halbreich, Jacob Cohen, Martin B. Keller, Nancy C. Andreasen, William Coryell, Wilma Harrison and Paula J. Clayton. Their work appears in journals such as Comprehensive Psychiatry, Journal of Affective Disorders, Psychiatry Research, Psychological Bulletin and Multivariate Behavioral Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026