John N. van den Anker
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health top 0.1%
- Pharmacology top 0.5%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 1%
- Epidemiology top 5%
- Infectious Diseases top 2%
- Co-authors
- Karel AllegaertJohan W. MoutonDick TibboelMatthijs de HoogNatella RakhmaninaJan LindemansKathleen NevilleIan M. Paul
- Topics
- Pharmaceutical studies and practices (59 papers)Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy (40 papers)Pediatric Pain Management Techniques (17 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesNetherlandsSwitzerland
In The Last Decade
John N. van den Anker
176 papers receiving 6.5k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 141
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 3.6k
- Pharmacology 1.6k
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 1.2k
- Epidemiology 849
- Infectious Diseases 784
Countries citing papers authored by John N. van den Anker
This map shows the geographic impact of John N. van den Anker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John N. van den Anker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John N. van den Anker more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John N. van den Anker
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John N. van den Anker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John N. van den Anker. The network helps show where John N. van den Anker may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of John N. van den Anker
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John N. van den Anker. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John N. van den Anker based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John N. van den Anker. John N. van den Anker is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8 | |
| 2 | 5 | |
| 3 | 7 | |
| 4 | 4 | |
| 5 | 17 | |
| 6 | 48 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 13 | |
| 9 | 16 | |
| 10 | 11 | |
| 11 | 5 | |
| 12 | 52 | |
| 13 | 34 | |
| 14 | 55 | |
| 15 | 28 | |
| 16 | 17 | |
| 17 | Analgesic trials in neonates: observations, pitfalls and recommendations. | 2 |
| 18 | 14 | |
| 19 | 66 | |
| 20 | 77 |
About John N. van den Anker
John N. van den Anker is a scholar working on Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine and Pharmacology, having authored 180 papers that have together received 6.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pharmaceutical studies and practices (59 papers), Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy (40 papers) and Pediatric Pain Management Techniques (17 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (3.6k citations), Pharmacology (1.6k citations) and Pharmacology (782 citations). John N. van den Anker has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Karel Allegaert, Johan W. Mouton, Dick Tibboel, Matthijs de Hoog, Natella Rakhmanina, Jan Lindemans, Kathleen Neville, Ian M. Paul, Thomas P. Green and Jeffrey L. Galinkin. Their work appears in journals such as JAMA, PEDIATRICS and Advanced Energy Materials.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.